检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪庆华[1] 白蕾 WANG Qinghua;BAI Lei(School of Sociology and Political Science,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
机构地区:[1]上海大学社会学院,上海200444
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期135-149,共15页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般项目(2019BZZ005)。
摘 要:我国社会组织对其他主体尤其是政府主体存在资源依赖,这对其自主性有所限制。已有研究对社会组织自主性的理解和操作化集中于社会组织的财务、人事、组织发展规划等方面,但对其业务活动过程中的自主性讨论较少且与其他方面自主性的区分不够。聚焦Y组织在参与社区微治理过程中的自主性进行研究,发现在面向不同主体时,社会组织谋求自主性的主导逻辑有所不同:因对街道的资源依赖程度较深,Y组织采取“有底线地遵从”策略以管理对街道的资源依赖,并以专业逻辑为主导获得自主性;面对社区相关利益主体时,Y组织采取“操纵式地满足”策略,并以合法性逻辑为主导,拓展其在社区中的自主性。The autonomy of China’s social organizations is restrained due to their resource dependency on other stakeholders,especially governmental bodies.Previous studies focus on the interpretation and operation of the autonomy of social organizations in terms of their finance,personnel,and structural development planning,leaving much to be discussed concerning their autonomy in the process of business activities and the differences between different types of autonomy.A case study of the autonomy of the organization Y in its engagement in community micro-governance finds that it followed different logic of autonomy while interacting with different stakeholders.Specifically,when interacting with street offices on which its resources highly depended,Y adopted an“above-the-bottom-line compliance”strategy to manage its level of dependence and obtained autonomy by sticking to the logic of being professional.When interacting with a variety of other stakeholders located in the community,Y adopted a“manipulative”strategy to meet their needs and obtained greater level of autonomy by sticking to the dominant logic of legitimacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28