检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:符阳懿 冯永新[1] 钱博[1] FU Yangyi;FENG Yongxin;QIAN Bo(Shenyang Ligong University,Shenyang 110159,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳理工大学信息科学与工程学院,沈阳110159
出 处:《沈阳理工大学学报》2024年第2期22-28,共7页Journal of Shenyang Ligong University
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(61971291);辽宁省教育厅科学研究项目(LJKZ0242)。
摘 要:为解决车载毫米波雷达目标检测过程中在相邻多目标情况下会提高检测门限值,从而导致目标遮蔽现象,引发传统恒虚警(constant false alarm rate, CFAR)检测在多目标环境下产生漏检的问题,提出一种等分剔除恒虚警检测算法(equipartition deletion CFAR,ED-CFAR)。通过将目标两侧的参考单元等分取平均值得到子参考单元,对大于所有参考单元平均值的部分进行处理后排序,剔除部分较大子参考单元,计算得到门限值,与目标的信号幅度进行比较判断目标是否存在。仿真结果表明,在多目标检测的仿真场景下,信噪比为10 dB时,ED-CFAR算法的检测概率比单元平均恒虚警(CA-CFAR)算法提高0.39,比筛选平均恒虚警(CMLD-CFAR)算法提高了0.08,有效解决了传统均值类恒虚警检测在相邻多目标条件下的遮蔽问题。In order to solve the problem of raising the detection threshold in the condition of adjacent multiple targets,which leads to the missed detection in the multi-target environment,amillimeter wave radar CFAR algorithm based on equipartition deletion is proposed.The reference units on both sides of the target are equally divided into average values to obtain sub-reference units.Parts larger than the average of all reference units are sorted after processing.Some larger sub-reference units are eliminated.The threshold is calculated and compared with the signal amplitude of the target to determine whether the target exists.When the SNR is 10 dB,simulation results show that detection probability of ED-CFAR is 0.39 higher than that of cell averaging CFAR(CA-CFAR)and 0.08 higher than that of censored mean level detector(CMLD-CFAR).The target masking problem of mean level CFAR is effectively solved in the case of adjacent multiple targets.
分 类 号:TN957.51[电子电信—信号与信息处理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.238.221