检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李心钰 吴彩琴[1] 周洁[1] 张锦玉[1] 耿朝辉 LI Xinyu;WU Caiqin;ZHOU Jie;ZHANG Jinyu;GENG Zhaohui(School of Nursing,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203)
出 处:《中医教育》2024年第1期109-115,共7页Education of Chinese Medicine
基 金:上海中医药大学第二十二期课程建设项目(No.2023SHUTCMKCJS052);上海中医药大学第十九期课程建设重点项目(No.2020SHUTCM004)。
摘 要:目的 构建循证护理理念指导下的基础护理学教学方案,并评价其教学效果。方法 针对2个平行教学班分别采用循证理念教学法和常规教学,通过量性与质性访谈2种方法对教改效果进行综合评价。结果 问卷结果显示,实验教学班在批判性思维能力总分及寻找真相、开放思想、批判思维的自信心等维度上的得分较基线水平有显著提高,同时,实施课程改革后实验教学班较对照教学班在寻找真相方面有了大幅提升。从访谈结果看,护生增强了循证护理概念、增加了主动学习行为。结论 该课程方案具有一定可行性,有助于学生形成批判性思维,激发对学生课程及专业的主动思考。Objective To establish a teaching plan under the guidance of the evidence-based nursing for the course Nursing Fundamentals,and evaluate its teaching effects.Methods Eevidence-based teaching and conventional ways of teaching were offered respectively to two classes at the same level,and the teaching outcomes were comprehensively evaluated by quantitative questionnaire survey and qualitative interviews.Results The survey showed that the total score of critical thinking ability,and the scores of truth-seeking,open-mindedness,and self-confidence were significantly improved of the experimental class with evidence-based teaching compared with the baseline level.Meanwhile,the experimental class scored much higher in truth-seeking after the course reform compared with the control class receiving traditional teaching.Furthermore,the interviews showed that nursing students in the experimental group boasted better evidence-based nursing concepts and more active learning behaviors.Conclusion This teaching project is feasible,which helps students develop critical thinking and stimulates active learning of the course and the major.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222