检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜盼盼 徐嘉[1] DU Pan-pan;XU Jia(Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,PRC)
机构地区:[1]东南大学,南京211189
出 处:《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期47-55,共9页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(项目号:KYCX19-0132)的阶段性研究果。
摘 要:随着当代科学技术的迅速发展,科技所带来的伦理风险也与日俱增。为了应对这些伦理风险,进行科技伦理治理就成为必然。在科技伦理治理中,建立全过程的伦理审查机制至为关键。全过程伦理审查机制将科技活动划分为议程设置、产品研发和使用三个阶段,依据不同阶段的风险特征,提出了与之相匹配的六种伦理审查形式或制度,即专业审查、公众质询、“伦理屏风”、“道德物化”、风险反馈与伦理救济。在此基础上,构建了以扩展性伦理评估委员会为核心,基于事前预防、事中控制和事后补救的全过程伦理审查机制,以期不断推动科技向善,造福人类社会。With the rapid development of science and technology,the relevant ethical risks are also increasing.In order to deal with these ethical risks,it is a must to conduct sci-tech ethical govemance.In this process,it is crucial to establish a whole-process ethical review mechanism which divides scientific and technological activities into three stages:the agenda setting,the product development and the product use.According to the risk characteristics of different stages,this paper proposes six forms or systems of ethical review accordingly,namely,professional examination,public inquiry,“ethical screen”,“moralizing tech-nology”,risk feedback and ethical relief.On this basis,it establishes a wholeprocess ethical review mechanism with an ex-panded ethics evaluation committee as the core and on the basis of pre-prevention,in-process control,and post-remediation to continuously promote good-oriented science and technology and to benefit the human society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222