检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏婷[1] WEI Ting(School of Teacher Education,Nanjing Xiaozhuang University,Nanjing 211171,China)
机构地区:[1]南京晓庄学院教师教育学院,江苏南京211171
出 处:《南京晓庄学院学报》2023年第6期109-117,共9页Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
摘 要:游戏化学习日益受到中美两国学者的关注,成为学界热点的研究议题。为了更好地了解中美两国在游戏化学习领域的现状和发展态势,文章采用Biblioshiny文献计量工具梳理和剖析中美游戏化学习研究的格局与热点、主题演变历史与发展趋势。研究发现,整体上中美两国游戏化学习研究呈现齐头并进的增长态势,我国游戏化学习研究的主题分布更加广泛,美国游戏化学习研究注重理论研究。文章进一步从研究热点、研究趋向、研究格局等几个方面对中美游戏化学习研究的共性与差异进行了比较分析,在此基础上提出了我国游戏化学习研究有待进一步发展的方向,为我国游戏化学习理论研究和实践创新提供参考。Game-based learning has received increasing attention from scholars in China and the United States,and has become a hot research topic in academia.To better understand the current situation and development trend of the field of game-based learning in China and the United States,this study adopts Biblioshiny program to sort out and analyze the pattern and hot spots,the history and development trend of the topics of game-based learning research in both countries.The study found that overall game-based learning research in China and the United States is growing in tandem,with a wider distribution of themes in China s game-based learning research and a greater focus on theoretical research in the United States.Further,the commonalities and differences between China and the United States game-based learning research are compared and analyzed in terms of research hotspots,trends,and patterns,and on this basis,directions for further development of game-based learning research in China are proposed to provide a reference for theoretical research and practical innovation of game-based learning in China.
关 键 词:游戏化学习 研究图景 主题演变 文献计量 比较研究
分 类 号:G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.153.204