乡土叙事中民间伦理书写的经典路径——基于《红高粱家族》与《边城》之比较  

The Classical Paths of Folk Ethics Writing in Local Narration——Based on the Comparison between Red Sorghum Family and Border Town

作　　者：刘志峰[1] LIU Zhifeng(Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250100)

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东济南250100

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2024年第4期15-22,共8页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：不同的乡土叙事路径折射出莫言、沈从文小说独特而异质的民间叙事伦理,两者“同途而殊归”。莫言对民间根部的生存伦理的追慕,始终建立在现实批判的基础之上,在《红高粱家族》中,时间意义上的“过去”构成了一种新型伦理秩序的精神来源。沈从文对边地人情与爱情的想象,则是在压抑现实中悲剧性因素的前提下,在对“过去”的永恒之美的体认中,隐隐地透露出一种知识者的悲悯。然而,《边城》中的“过去”所营造的伦理境遇却潜在地将读者引向伦理判断的虚空。在20世纪中国文学民间伦理书写层面,这两种路径颇具代表性且影响深远。Different local narrative approaches reflect the unique and different folk narrative ethics in Mo Yan and Shen Congwen’s novels.Mo Yan’s admiration for the folk roots of survival ethics is always based on reality criticism.In Red Sorghum Family,the past in the sense of time constitutes the spiritual source of a new ethical order.On the premise of suppressing the tragic factors in reality,Shen Congwen's imagination of human feelings and love in Border Town vaguely reveals a kind of intellectual compassion in the recognition of the eternal beauty of the past.However,the ethical situation created by the“past”in Border Town potentially leads readers to the void of ethical judgment.At the level of folk ethics writing in Chinese literature in the 20th century,the two approaches are representative and far-reaching.

关 键 词：《红高粱家族》 《边城》 乡土叙事路径 叙事伦理 民间伦理 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]