论网络犯罪案件的电子数据审查方法  

The method of the examination of electronic data in cybercrime cases

作　　者：杜邈 田坤 Du Miao;Tian Kun(People’s Procuratorate of Beijing Municipality,Beijing,100005;People’s Procuratorate of Haidian District,Beijing,100089)

机构地区：[1]北京市人民检察院,北京100005 [2]北京市海淀区人民检察院,北京100089

出　　处：《证据科学》2024年第1期28-38,共11页Evidence Science

基　　金：2021年国家检察官学院科研基金资助项目《网络犯罪惩治中的诉讼证明—以电子数据的技术审查为视角》(GJY2021D01)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：近年来,网络犯罪呈现多发频发态势,黑灰产链条更新迭代,犯罪生态日趋复杂,对电子数据审查提出了法律与技术的双重挑战。网络犯罪案件的电子数据具有体量庞大、类型多样、内容繁杂、解析困难等特点,应当从“客观性”“合法性”“关联性”等抽象要求,转变为溯源审查、动态审查、多向审查等具体方法,充分发挥电子数据的证明作用。从电子数据的来源、收集和固定等方面,确保电子数据的关键内容未受到污损。从“海量”数据检索、“删改”数据还原、“附属”数据分析、“多源”数据碰撞等方面,充分挖掘电子数据蕴含的信息。从同一性事实、技术事实、主观事实、批量对象事实等方面,拓展电子数据的证明方向。criteria such as"objectivity""legality"and"relevance",should transit towards more concrete approaches,which include traceability examination,dynamic examination,and multi-directional examination,so as to give electronic data full play in the process of proof.Effort should be put in the examination of the source,collection and fixation of electronic data,in order to ensure the key data content has not been contaminated.Effort should also be put in the retrieval of"massive"data,the restoration of"deleted or modified"data,the analysis of"subsidiary"data,and the collision of"multi-source"data,in order to fully explore the evidentiary capability of electronic data.Effort should also be put in the distinction of the identity fact,technical fact,subjective fact,and batches of object fact,in order to expand the usage of electronic data in the process of proof.

关 键 词：网络犯罪 电子数据 证明 海量 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]