检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪贤泽 周文叶[2] WANG Xianze;ZHOU Wenye(Faculty of Teacher Education,Taizhou University,Linhai Zhejiang,317000;Department of Curriculum and Instruction,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062)
机构地区:[1]台州学院教师教育学院,浙江临海317000 [2]华东师范大学课程与教学系,上海200062
出 处:《现代基础教育研究》2024年第1期91-97,共7页Research on Modern Basic Education
摘 要:如何进行有效的教师评价是各国共同关注的话题。按照建立的分析框架,重点考察了英国、新加坡、葡萄牙和智利等国家的教师评价经验并进行了反思。主要的经验是:评价的目的设定兼顾认证和发展,评价的内容注重有法可依,评价的组织与实施强调专业化,评价结果处理注意问责与改进的平衡。启示是:在理论上去分析和研究教师评价实施面临的主要问题,在实践上做好教师评价实施的专业性保障。How to conduct effective teacher evaluation is a topic of common concern among countries.Based on the estab-lished analytical framework,the teacher evaluation experience of countries such as the UK,Singapore,Portugal,and Chile were ex-amined and reflected on.The main experience includes the following aspects:the purpose of evaluation is to set rules for and fo-cus on certification and development,the content of evaluation emphasizes legal basis,the organization and implementation of evaluation highlights professionalism,and the handling of evaluation results focuses on a balance between accountability and im-provement.Based on that,we can get the following reference that we should analyze and study the main problems faced by the im-plementation of teacher evaluation by means of the theory,and should ensure the professionalism in actual practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63