能动司法背景下城区人民法庭参与诉源治理的逻辑与进路——以新时代人民法庭建设的“花乡做法”为中心  

The Logic and Approach of Managing the Source of Litigation in Urban People's Court:Centered on the“Huaxiang Case”in the Construction of People's Courts in the New Era

作　　者：陈寒非[1] CHEN Hanfei(Law School,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China)

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学法学院,北京100070

出　　处：《现代法学》2024年第2期40-55,共16页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“全面提升社会治理法治化水平研究”(23ZDA080)。

摘　　要：新时代人民法庭建设的“花乡做法”表明,诉源治理是当前城区人民法庭参与基层社会治理的重要方式。诉源治理基本上覆盖了纠纷发生前后全过程,纠纷发生前主要以风险预测为主,纠纷解决中则以工作指引、调解指导及裁判说理等方式为主,纠纷解决后则以司法建议为主。人民法庭的诉源治理策略贯彻着“政策—法律”“跨界—守界”双重逻辑,前者是人民法庭的一般逻辑,而后者则是城区人民法庭的特有逻辑。双重逻辑内部存在着结构性张力,城区人民法庭与其他治理主体的关系应从分工转向合作,通过诉源治理增强分工合作的主动性与灵活性,与其他非司法性力量协同解决复杂的城市治理问题。A case study based on the“Huaxiang experience”shows that governance of sources of litigation is the main strategy for urban people’s courts to participate in grassroots social governance.Governance of sources of litigation basically covers the whole process before and after a dispute occurs.Before a dispute occurs,risk prediction is the main focus;during dispute resolution,work guidelines,mediation guidance,and referee reasoning are the main methods;after dispute resolution,judicial advice is the main focus.The source of litigation management strategy in people’s court implements the dual logic of“policies-law”and“crossover-defense”.The former is the general logic of the people’s courts,while the latter is the unique logic of the urban people’s courts.There are structural tensions within the dual logic.The relationship between urban people’s courts and other governance subjects should shift from jurisdictional competition to jurisdictional cooperation,actively create“intentional blurring of boundaries”through litigation source governance,and cooperate with other non-judicial forces to jointly resolve complex issues.

关 键 词：城区人民法庭 诉源治理 双重逻辑 合作治理 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]