检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:代澎瑞 邹能锋[1] DAI Pengrui;ZOU Nengfeng(School of Economics and Management,Anhui Agricultural University,Anhui 230036,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学经济管理学院,安徽合肥230036
出 处:《荆楚理工学院学报》2024年第2期53-60,共8页Journal of Jingchu University of Technology
摘 要:基于企业发展呈现“脱实向虚”现象的背景下,从企业高管的角度出发,以2011~2021年中国A股上市公司为研究样本,研究高管过度自信与企业金融化之间的关系,并探究分析师关注这一外部监督机制对两者关系的调节效应。研究结果表明,高管过度自信正向影响企业金融化水平,过度自信的高管更倾向于配置较多的金融资产。在分析师的外部关注与监督下,高管过度自信引发的企业金融化能够在一定程度上得到缓解。进一步传导路径分析表明,企业风险承担水平在高管过度自信与企业金融化的关系中起到了中介作用,过度自信的高管具有的风险偏好性是导致其配置过多金融资产的原因之一。Based on the background that the development of enterprises presents the phenomenon of"disenchantment from reality",starting from the perspective of enterprise executives and taking Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2021 as research sample,we test the relationship between top executives’overconfidence and enterprise financialization,and explore the moderating effect of analyst coverage,an external monitoring,on the relationship between them.The results show that top executives’overconfidence has a positive impact on enterprise financialization,and overconfident executives are more inclined to allocate more financial assets.With external coverage and supervision by analysts,enterprise financialization triggered by executive overconfidence can be mitigated to a certain extent.Further transmission path analysis shows that the level of corporate risk-taking mediates the relationship between top executives’overconfidence and enterprise financialization,and that the risk-averse of top executives’overconfidence is one of the reasons for their excessive allocation to financial assets.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7