基于德尔菲法构建临床医学专业本科生教学评估指标的研究  

Construction of teaching evaluation indices for undergraduate medicine students based on the Delphi method

作　　者：何旋 褚红玲[2] 谷士贤[1] He Xuan;Chu Hongling;Gu Shixian(Department of Education,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China;Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学第三医院教育处,北京100191 [2]北京大学第三医院临床流行病学研究中心,北京100191

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2024年第3期338-342,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

摘　　要：目的本文旨在构建一套面向临床医学本科生教学,适应临床教学发展与需求,具有科学性、导向性、可行性的教学评估指标。方法在文献研究、半结构式访谈和小组讨论的基础上拟定指标体系初稿,并编制函询问卷,采用德尔菲法对全国25名专家进行两轮函询。采用SPSS 27.0软件进行统计分析。结果2轮专家函询问卷回收率均为100.0%,专家积极程度高;专家权威系数>0.84,可靠性强;各指标变异系数为0~0.22,第2轮协调系数高于第1轮,且P<0.001,专家意见的协调程度较高且专家意见一致性结果较为可信。最终形成了针对临床医学专业本科生理论授课、见实习带教和在线理论课程的质量评估指标,包括一级指标6~7项、二级指标12~14项。结论通过科学、规范地应用德尔菲法,建立了一套较为全面、适应新时代发展、具有临床特色的本科生教学评估指标,全面提高了教学质量,促进了医学人才的培养。Objective To construct a set of scientific,oriented,and feasible teaching evaluation indices for undergraduate clinical medicine teaching that are suitable for the development and needs of clinical teaching.Methods A preliminary index system was established based on literature search,semi-structured interview,and group discussion,and then a consultation questionnaire was compiled to conduct two rounds of consultation with 25 Chinese experts.SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results The questionnaire recovery rate was 100.0%for both rounds of consultation,indicating the highly active participation of experts.The authority coefficient of experts was>0.84,indicating a high degree of reliability.The coefficient of variation was 0-0.22 for each index,and the coordination coefficient of the second round was higher than that of the first round(P<0.001),indicating a relatively high degree of coordination of expert opinions and relatively credible results of the consistency of expert opinions.Finally a set of quality assessment indices were developed for theoretical lectures,clinical teaching,and online theoretical courses for undergraduate medical students,including 6-7 primary indices and 12-14 secondary indices.Conclusions Through the scientific and standardized application of the Delphi method,a set of comprehensive undergraduate teaching evaluation indices with clinical characteristics have been developed,which can adapt to the development of the new era,improve the quality of teaching,and promote the development of medical talents.

关 键 词：临床医学 本科生 教学评估指标 德尔菲法 

分 类 号：R33[医药卫生—人体生理学]