文学“小史”与历史“大事”——“新史学”与胡适《谈新诗》的批评理路  

Literary"Minor History"and Historical"Major Events"A Study of the Relationship Between New Historiography and the Critical Theory And Path of Hu Shih's Talking about New Poetry

作　　者：罗义华[1] 骆羽芯 Luo Yihua;Luo Yuxin(South-central Minzu University)

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学文学与新闻传播学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期125-132,共8页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(23BZW116)。

摘　　要：胡适兼具新史学家与新文学家的身份,他的新诗批评彰显了“以史入文”和“以文入史”的辩证法。一方面,他取径“新史学”的核心观念与方法,将“进化”史观、科学实证等融进《谈新诗》一文,使其呈现历史和科学的双重维度,依循着一条“以史入文”的批评理路。另一方面,他以《谈新诗》一文参与新诗史的建构又折射出其以新诗批评进入历史的文学诉求,体现了“以文入史”的批评意图。在文史互动视域下钩沉“新史学”与《谈新诗》的互动渊源与路径,为窥见“新史学”在胡适文学观念中的位置与功能、辨析“新史学”与“新文学”之间的隐秘联系,提供了一个具体而微的佐证。A new historian as well as a new literary scholar,Hu Shih highlights the dialectic of"history into literature"and"literature into history"in his criticism of new poems.On the one hand,he took the core concepts and methods of the"New Historiography"and integrated the"evolutionary"view of history and sci‐entific empirical evidence into the article Talking about New Poetry,giving it the dual dimensions of history and science,following the critical line of reasoning of"history into literature".On the other hand,his partici‐pation in the construction of the history of new poetry with the article Talking about New Poetry reflects his literary aspiration to enter history with new poetry criticism,giving expression to his critical intention of"en‐tering history with literature".Under the perspective of the interaction between literature and history,to probe into the interaction between"New Historiography"and Talking about New Poetry will provide a concrete and subtle circumstantial evidence to catch a glimpse of the role and function of"New Historiography"in Hu Shih's conception of literature,and the hidden connection between"New Historiography"and"New Litera‐ture".

关 键 词：胡适 新史学 《谈新诗》 新诗批评 新文学 文史互动 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]