林语堂自译研究:“译创”理论视角——以《小评论:林语堂双语文集》为个案  

A Study on Lin Yutang’s Self-translation:A Theoretical Perspective of Transcreation:A case study of“The Little Critic:The Bilingual Essays”of Lin Yutang

作　　者：孔标[1] KONG Biao(College Foreign Language Teaching Department,Anhui Wenda University of Information Engineering,Hefei,Anhui,230201,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽文达信息工程学院大学外语教学部,安徽合肥230201

出　　处：《凯里学院学报》2024年第1期76-83,共8页Journal of Kaili University

基　　金：安徽省教育厅2021年省级人文社科重点项目“林语堂译创研究”(SK2021A0816);安徽省教育厅2022年青年人才重点项目“‘文化自信’视域下徽州文化外宣翻译机制研究”(编号:gxyqZD2022092)。

摘　　要：本文以“译创”为理论指导,系统考察林语堂在《小评论:林语堂双语文集》中的自译行为,探讨其自译的总体策略,明确所采用的具体翻译技巧以及自译与“译创”之间的关系。通过研究,文章提出三个观点:一是无论是自译还是“译创”,译者均比普通译者享有更多的自由度和创造性;二是“改写”是林语堂自译中采用的总体策略,主要包括阐释、增译和省译,而这些技巧与“译创”的特点是相一致的;三是自译与“译创”之间存在相互成就、相互补充的关系,“译创”能为自译提供理论指导作用,自译则是“译创”的一种表现形式。本研究能够拓展林语堂研究的空间和丰富“译创”理论的内涵意义。Based on the theory of“transcreation”,this paper makes a systematic investigation of Lin Yutang's selftranslation in“The Little Critic:The Bilingual Essays of Lin Yutang”,explores the overall strategy of Lin Yutang's self-translation,and makes clear the specific translation techniques he uses the relationship between selftranslation and“transcreation”.The paper proposes the following three points:Firstly,in both of self-translation and“transcreation”,translators enjoy more freedom and creativity than ordinary translators;Secondly,“rewriting”is the overall strategy adopted by Lin Yutang in his self-translation,mainly including paraphrase,expansion and omission which are mapping with the characteristics of“transcreation”.Thirdly,self-translation and“transcreation”are mutually dependent and complementary.“Transcreation”can provide theoretical guidance for self-translation,while self-translation is a type of“transcreation”.This study can expand the space of Lin Yutang's research and enrich“transcreation”theory.

关 键 词：自译 译创 林语堂 改写 

分 类 号：I211[文学—中国文学]