论苏格拉底—柏拉图技艺类比视域的道德论证  

On the Moral Argument from the Perspective of Socrates-Platos Craft Analogy

作　　者：郭鹏坤 Guo Peng Kun(School of Marxism,Henan Institute of Science and Technology,Xinxiang 453003,Henan,China)

机构地区：[1]河南工学院马克思主义学院,河南新乡453003

出　　处：《湖北社会科学》2024年第2期150-156,共7页Hubei Social Sciences

基　　金：河南工学院高层次引进人才科研启动金资助项目“西方伦理学视角下人的概念研究”(KQ1842)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：苏格拉底—柏拉图在早期著作中经常在技艺专家与改善灵魂的专家(好人)、专家技艺与道德知识之间作类比。这些类比是建立在技艺专家和好人共享知识性特征与一些内涵相似基础上的。但是,通过文本分析,技艺专家与好人、道德知识与专家技艺的相似性是局部的,而二者差异则是根本的。道德知识和专家技艺的价值等级不同;好人与技艺专家为善为恶的维度不同;好人与专家技艺的实践知识与理论知识的条件关系不同,二者与对象的处理关系也不同。因此,它们的相似性并不足以构成苏格拉底—柏拉图道德论证的模型。SocratesandPlato often made analogies between technical experts and those good persons who improve the soul of others,and between expert skills and moral knowledgein their early works.These analogies are based on the sharing of knowledge characteristics and some similarities in connotations between technical experts and good people.Through text analysis,the similarity between technical experts and good people,as well as the similarity between moral knowledge and expert skills,is local,while the difference between them is fundamental.The value level of moral knowledge is different from that of expert skills,and good persons and technical experts can be distinguished from different dimensions of goodness and evil.Their practical knowledge and theoretical knowledge have different conditional relationships,and the same goes for their handling relationships with the object.Therefore,similarities between themare not sufficient to form the model of Socrates-Platos moral argument.

关 键 词：技艺类比 好人 专家技艺 道德知识 

分 类 号：B502.231[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B502.232