从“杂文”到“古文”——宋代总集编选与新体论说文的文体独立  

From“Essay”to“Classical Prose”--The Compilation of Song Literary Anthology and the Style Independence of the New Style of Argumentation

作　　者：邬志伟 WU Zhiwei(School of Chinese Classics,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006)

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学国学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2024年第2期114-121,共8页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“宋代文体新变与文体形态研究”(20YJC751034)。

摘　　要：唐宋古文运动中兴起的原、解、辩、说等新体论说文,在内容上以立意为宗,着眼于思想的论辩与义理的阐释,在命篇与表达上师法经、子、史,呈现重要新变。这种新变既是以韩、柳为代表的古文家的创造与主动选择,也是时代思想嬗变的文体表征。这些新体论说文在进入集部时遭遇如何归类的尴尬处境。宋初总集《文苑英华》以“杂文”一目容纳这些作品,至姚铉编《唐文粹》,特设“古文”一目,将其突显于其他文体之外。从北宋到南宋,各种古文选本的编定,使这些新体论说文从“杂文”中剥离出来,成为古文经典,获得了独立的文体地位。The new style of argumentation that emerged in the Ancient Prose Movement in the Tang and Song Dynasties,such as Yuan,Jie,Bian,and Shuo,aims at the conception of content,focuses on the arguments of thought and the explication of argumentation,and follows the method of Confucian classics,philosophy,and history in the article naming and expression,presenting significant new changes.This new change is not only the creation and active choice of the classical prose writers represented by Han Yu and Liu Zongyuan but also the stylistic characterization of the transmutation of the thoughts of the times.This new style of argumentation encountered the awkward situation of how to be classified in the collection of literary works.The early Song literary anthology Wen Yuan Ying Hua contained these works under the category of“essay”,and when Yao Xuan compiled Tang Wen Cui,a special category of“classical prose”was created,distinguishing these works from other literary forms.From the Northern Song Dynasty to the Southern Song Dynasty,the compilation of various classical prose anthology made the new style of argumentation detached from the“essay”and become classical prose classics,gaining an independent style position.

关 键 词：杂文 古文 总集 新体论说文 文体独立 

分 类 号：I05[文学—文学理论]