《礼记·乐记》篇的文本传承及作者问题再辨析——兼论《乐记》作者与编者的区分  

Re-discussion on the Text Inheritance and Author of The Records of YUE:A Partial Discussion On Distinguishing Between Authors and Compilers

作　　者：张道奎 ZHANG Daokui

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,济南250100

出　　处：《孔子研究》2024年第2期103-111,159,共10页Confucius Studies

摘　　要：目前学界关于《礼记·乐记》篇的文本形成问题讨论颇多,其中关于《乐记》作者的讨论主要集中在公孙尼子与荀子等方面,而《汉书·艺文志》的基本判断仍未得到应有的重视。从《乐记》文本内容来看,《乐记》最终编纂成书及版本的流传修订虽在汉初,但其主体则由先秦时期儒家学派的“诸子言乐事”等文字组成;从《乐记》传承来看,居于兰陵—稷下的荀子及其后学固然对相关文本的整理与传承有较大贡献,但也不应忽视居于西河—河间的子夏、魏文侯及窦公、刘德及毛生、王定及王禹等一脉的编纂传承之功绩。同时,区分《礼记·乐记》的作者和编者,更有助于我们更准确地理解《乐记》等儒家文献的形成及其传承过程。There was a lot of discussion in the academic community about the text formation of The Records of YUE,among which the discussion about the authors of The Records of YUE mainly focuses on aspects such as Gongsun Nizi and Xunzi.However,the basic judgment of the chapter of Yi Wen Zhi has not yet received the necessary attention.The main content of The Records of YUE should be produced by the Zhou Dynasty Confucianism in the school of“Discussion of Music among Scholars”and other text composition,and the text of the final compilation into a book and the version of the revision in the early of Han Dynasty;in The Records of YUE chapters and related text transmission process,Xunzi and his descendants in Lanling-Jixia certainly made a contribution to the compilation and transmission of the related texts,but we should not overlook the compilation and transmission of the works of Zixia of the Xihe-Hejian,the Marquis of Weiwen and the Duke of Dou,Liu De and Mao Sheng,and Wang Ding and Wang Yu.etc.And,the distinction between authors and compilers of The Records of YUE text helps us to understand more accurately the temporal and spatial attributes of Confucian literature.

关 键 词：《乐记》 子夏 诸子言乐事 作者与编者 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]