空间、流动、位置性:张力中的全球史书写  

Space,Flow,Positionality:the Writing of Global History in Tensions

作　　者：朱啸乾 Zhu Xiaoqian

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院

出　　处：《世界历史评论》2024年第1期158-180,294,295,共25页The World History Review

摘　　要：就跳脱传统世界历史研究的容器式思维与方法论民族主义而言,全球史研究在三个方面取得了进展:一是以全球微观史作为新的研究路径和书写方式,探寻多维历史空间的转换与重构,呈现跨界力量在微观层面的调适与互动过程;二是超越对流动性的痴迷,汲取后殖民主义权力批判的理论资源,深入揭示跨界历史整合进程中的权力背景与扩张机制;三是在对虚构的目的论与本土主义叙事进行批判的同时,处理好“世界”构建的固有位置性。归根结底,三者旨在调适全球史研究的内在张力,从认识论和方法论层面彰显全球史融通宏微、审思流动、从自身出发的学术面向,重构其多元的学术格局。在全球史热潮席卷之时,矫正偏颇理解、完整把握其学术旨趣与意蕴,对张力中的全球史书写而言至关重要。Since the rise of global history,it has made unremitting efforts to break out of the container historical thinking and methodological nationalism,and has made the latest progress in three aspects.First,the global microhistory is taken as the new direction and breakthrough point to explore the combination and reconstruction of multiple spatial dimensions,and present the adjustment and interaction process of cross-border forces at the micro level;the second is to beyond the obsession with fluidity,draw theoretical resources about the criticism of power from post-colonialism,and pay appropriate attention to the power background and expansion mechanism of cross-border integration process;the third is to accept the inherent positionality of world construction while criticizing the fictional teleology and nativism narratives.In the final analysis,all three aim to adjust the inner academic tensions of global history,manifest the combination of macroscopic and microscopic views,reflection on fluidity and based on oneself of global history from the level of epistemology and methodology,and reshape its diversified academic patterns.When global history rolls up,its very important to adjust the inner tensions of global history by correct the biased understanding and grasp its academic purport and implication.

关 键 词：全球史 全球微观史 后殖民主义 欧洲中心论 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]