徐复观之眼观胡适:潜而未发的中国哲学研究“范式”之争  

Hu Shi in Xu Fuguan’s Eyes:A Hidden and Undeveloped Dispute over the“Paradigm”of Chinese Philosophical Research

作　　者：楼庭坚 Lou Tingjian(School of Philosophy,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学哲学学院,浙江杭州310000

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2024年第3期35-48,共14页Tribune of Social Sciences

摘　　要：作为现代新儒家的代表人物,徐复观自身的学术思想见解常在对胡适的评述中展开。然则从治学取向到文化理念,二氏间存在不可逾越的观念鸿沟,这背后是两代学人间容易被人忽视的中国哲学研究“范式”之争。有别于前人与胡适的论争,徐复观既质疑了胡适承自乾嘉考据学的“科学方法”,给出一套考证与疏释结合、提要钩玄思想家的中心结构的思想史方法,又对胡适以西方现代启蒙理念评判传统的“科学态度”作了细致反思,力图从中国本位出发,发掘本国文化的价值。徐复观对胡适“科学方法”与“科学态度”的省察,可为今日中国哲学的发展提供借鉴经验。As a representative of modern Neo-Confucianism,Xu Fuguan’s own academic ideas and opinions are often presented in his comment on Hu Shi.Behind this,it is the controversy of the two generations over the“paradigm”of Chinese philosophy research,which is easily ignored by scholars.Xu Fuguan,as a historian with a unique Confucian position,on the one hand questioned Hu Shi’s“scientific method”which inherited from Qianjia textual research,and gave a set of operable methods of ideological history that combined textual research and interpretation,and outlined the central structure of thinkers;On the other hand,he made a careful reflection on Hu Shi’s“scientific attitude”in judging the tradition with the Western modern enlightenment concepts,and tried to explore the unique value system of Chinese culture from the Chinese standard.Xu Fuguan’s inspection of Hu Shi’s“scientific attitude”and“scientific method”provides a reference for today’s Chinese philosophy research.

关 键 词：徐复观 胡适 中国哲学 范式 现代性 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学]