共同养育问卷测评中学生及父母的效度与信度  

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Coparenting Inventory for Parents and Adolescents in middle school students and parents

作　　者：王菁[1] 刘爱书[1] 迟梓远 WANG Jing;LIU Aishu;CHI Ziyuan(Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150025,China;Philosophise he Fakultat,Eberhard Karls University Tubingen,Tubingen D-72047,Germany)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院,哈尔滨150025 [2]艾伯哈特·卡尔斯·图宾根大学哲学系,德国图宾根D-72047

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2024年第6期520-527,共8页Chinese Mental Health Journal

摘　　要：目的:修订共同养育问卷(青少年版和父母版)(CI-PA)中文版,并在中学生及其父母中检验其效度和信度。方法:选取中学生691名完成CI-PA青少年版,其父母924名同时完成CI-PA父母版。将样本随机分半,分别进行条目分析和探索性因子分析及验证性因子分析、效标关联效度分析、聚敛效度检验。以Achenbach青少年行为自评量表(YSR)、Olson婚姻质量问卷(ENRICH)的婚姻满意度分量表(MSS)为效标工具。间隔4周后,随机选取中学生62人及父母70人进行重测。结果:探索性因子分析表明,青少年版和父母版分别有37、25个条目,分问卷均抽取了3个公因子,均包括合作、三角关系和冲突3个维度,各条目因子负荷为0.60~0.95,累积解释总方差64.56%~74.06%;验证性因子分析表明,青少年版分问卷(χ^(2)/df=1.32、1.30、1.41,CFI=0.99、0.99、0.99,TLI=0.99、0.99、0.98,RMSEA=0.03、0.03、0.03)和父母版分问卷(χ^(2)/df=1.20、1.33,CFI=0.99、0.99,TLI=0.99、0.99,RMSEA=0.02、0.03)模型均拟合良好。青少年版的合作维度得分与YSR攻击行为、焦虑/抑郁得分均负相关(ICC=-0.18~-0.27,均P<0.01),三角关系和冲突2个维度得分与YSR攻击行为、焦虑/抑郁得分均正相关(ICC=0.15~0.34,均P<0.01);父母版合作维度得分与MSS得分正相关(ICC=0.52、0.47,均P<0.01),三角关系和冲突2个维度得分与MSS得分负相关(ICC=-0.28~-0.47,均P<0.01)。青少年版和父母版分问卷各维度的Cronbachα系数均>0.72,重测信度(ICC)均>0.54。结论:共同养育问卷(青少年版和父母版)(CI-PA)中文版测评父母共同养育具有较好的效度和信度。Objective:To revise the Chinese version of the Coparenting Inventory for Parents and Adolescents(CI-PA)in middle school students and their parents to test the validity and reliability.Methods:Totally 691 middle school students were tested with the adolescent version of CI-PA,924 parents were tested with the parents'version of CI-PA.The sample was split randomly in half,and item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,confirmatory factor analysis,criterion validity analysis and convergent validity test were performed respectively.The Achenbach Youth Self-Report(YSR)and marital satisfaction subscale(MSS)of Olson Enrich Marital Inventory(ENRICH)were used to test the validity of the criterioa Totally 62 students and 70 parents were followed to complete the Chinese version of CI-PA 4 weeks after the first investigation.Results:Exploratory factor analysis showed dial there were 37 and 25 items in the adolescent version and the parents'version respectively,3 factors were extracted,including 3 dimensions of cooperation,triangulation and conflict.The factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.60 to 0.95,and the subscales explained the total variance ranged from 64.56%to 74.06%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the 3 factors models fitted well in adolescent version(χ^(2)/df=1.32,1.30,1.41;CFI=0.99,0.99,0.99;TLI=0.99,0.99,0.98;RMSEA=0.03,0.03,0.03)and the parents'version(χ^(2)/df=1.20,1.33;CFI=0.99,0.99;TLI=0.99,0.99;RMSEA=0.02,0.03).Cooperation scores of the adolescent version were negatively correlated with the YSR scores(ICC=-0.180.27,Ps<0.01),triangulation and conflict scores of the adolescent version were positively correlated with the YSR scores(ICC=0.15-0.34,Ps<0.01).Cooperation scores of the parents'version were positively correlated with the MSS scores(ICC=0.52,0.47,Ps<0.01),triangulation and conflict scores of the parents'version were negatively coij-elated with the MSS scores(ICC=-0.28--0.47,Ps<0.01).The Cronbach's a of 3 dimensions were all above 0.72,the retest reliabilities(ICC)were all a-bove 0.

关 键 词：共同养育 青少年 效度 信度 

分 类 号：B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]