公诉案件和解自愿性审查规则的重构进路  

The Reconstructive Approach to the Voluntary Review Rules of Public Prosecution Cases

作　　者：闫召华[1] 李璐[1] Yan Zhaohua;Li Lu(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》2024年第3期49-54,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“认罪认罚案件质效的评估与保障研究”(课题编号:GJ2022D09);西南政法大学2023年度学生科研创新项目“刑事案件在线审判的实践探索与制度构建”(项目编号:2023XZXS-116)。

摘　　要：自愿性是刑事和解制度适用的基础与前提。当前,刑事和解自愿性的审查实践中出现审查内容存在模糊性、审查方式浮于表面、和解协议书之法律性质不明晰、律师参与不足等问题。构建刑事和解自愿性的审查模式应坚持公正优先、兼顾效率的立场,明确刑事和解协议兼具公法契约与书证之法律属性;构建以形式审查为原则、以实质审查为补充的刑事和解自愿性审查机制。Voluntariness is the basis and prerequisite for the application of the criminal settlement system.Currently,in the practice of reviewing the voluntariness of criminal settlement,there are problems such as ambiguity in the content of the review,superficiality in the review method,lack of clarity in the legal nature of the settlement agreement,and insufficient participation of lawyers.In order to establish a model for reviewing the voluntariness of criminal settlements,it is necessary to adhere to the position of giving priority to fairness while taking into account efficiency;to clarify the legal attributes of criminal settlement agreements,which are both public law contracts and documents;and to establish a mechanism for reviewing the voluntariness of criminal settlements,based on the principle of formality and supplemented by substances.

关 键 词：和解自愿性 审查机制 证据契约 正当程序 证据印证 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]