“由法而象”客观解释原则的演变——一种对汉易象数之学发展逻辑的解释  

The Evolution of Law-to-Image Objective Interpretative Principle:On the Development Logic of the Han-yi’s Image-numberology

作　　者：王棋 WANG Qi(School of Marxism,China’s University of Mining Industry,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学马克思主义学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第11期36-43,95,共9页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：汉易象数之学重心由占筮派转移至注经派,其发展逻辑在于客观解释原则“由法而象”的演变。占筮派试图通过师法、家法作为解释的客观原则进入中华易学文明的创造历史。受法的约束和限制,该派对易象作神学解释、政治解释,宣扬阴阳灾异、占筮数术。与之相对,注经派不是不要师法、家法,而是突破师法、家法,将象数方法自身的根本性、客观性作为客观解释原则的新内涵。他们结合易辞对易象作语言解释,建立了方法论层面的象数解释理论。经郑玄、荀爽,至虞翻,象数易学达到理论化、学术化的顶峰。虞翻虽确立了象数解释的客观性,但是局限于易象与易辞的循环解释,取象方法上实现不了一元性。加剧了象数易学内部的矛盾运动,推动象数易学方法论的自我否定,其向玄学易学本体论的过渡具有理论上的必然性。In the Han dynasty,the focus of Image-numberology shifted from divinatory school to classic annotation school.Its development logic lies in the evolution of the law-to-image objective interpretation.The divinists tried to enter the history of the Han-yi through using the laws of mentor and family as objective principles of interpretation.Restricted by the laws,this school explained images from theological and political perspectives.In contrast,the classic annotators meant to break through the laws of mentor and family,and they took the essence and objectivity of the Image-numberology as the new connotation of objective interpretation.They established the theory of Image-numberology interpretation at the methodological level with the linguistic explanation of Yi Ci.From Zheng Xuan and Xun Shuang to Yu Fan,the Image-numberology reached the peak of theorization and academicization.Although Yu Fan had established the objectivity in the interpretation of the Image-numberology,he was limited to the circular interpretation of Yi-image and Yi Ci.It intensified the internal contradictions in the study of Han-yi,pushed it towards self-denial,and made its transition to the ontological metaphysical Yi inevitable.

关 键 词：汉易 法 象数 解释 客观原则 虞翻 

分 类 号：B221[哲学宗教—中国哲学]