世界主要发达国家医学的学术体系 发展比较及启示  

A Comparative Analysis of Academic Systems in Major Developed Countries in Medicine and Implications

作　　者：张研 方鑫[1,2] 高红霞 冯占春 ZHANG Yan;FANG Xin;GAO Hongxia;FENG Zhanchun(Research Center for Rural Health Services,Key Research Institute of Humani-ties and Social Sciences of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430030,China;School of Medicine and Health Management,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北省人文社会科学重点研究基地农卫健康服务研究中心,湖北武汉430030 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,湖北武汉430030

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2024年第10期59-64,共6页Medicine and Philosophy

基　　金：2022年中国工程院委托项目(2022-GJ-03);2021年湖北省高等学校省级教学研究项目(2021041)。

摘　　要：“新医科”的建设对于加强中国医学学术体系提出了新的要求。研究确立了包含学术训练、学术研究、学术评价的医学学术体系分析框架,检索和梳理了美、英、日、德、法五个国家医学的学术体系建设的历史沿革、显著特征以及发展趋势。发达国家具有教研一体的协同培养机制、严格的教育质量监管体系、多元筹资机制和注重应用的多维评价体系。建议我国医学教育促进学科交叉融合、注重应用为导向的科研经费分配与监管、重视医教产研合作的考核体系,以完善我国医学的学术体系建设。The construction of the"New Medical Science"has put forward new requirements for strengthening China's medical academic system.The study establishes a framework for analyzing the medical academic system,which includes academic training,academic research and academic evaluation.It examines and summarizes the historical development,distinctive features and development trends of the medical academic system in five developed countries,namely,the United States,the United Kingdom,Japan,Germany and France.Developed countries have synergistic training mechanism integrating teaching and research,strict quality control systems in education,diverse funding mechanism and multi-dimensional evaluation system focusing on application.It is suggested that China's medical education should promote interdisciplinary integration,allocate and regulate research funding with an application-oriented approach,and attach importance to the assessment system of medical education-industry-research cooperation to enhance the construction of China's medical academic system.

关 键 词：医学 学术体系 发达国家 医学教育 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]