卡尔加里-剑桥指南联合SEGUE量表在全科医师规范化培训教学改革中的应用  

Application of Calgary-Cambridge guideline combined with SEGUE scale in the teaching reform of general practitioner standardized training

作　　者：敬泽慧[1] 刘冀[1] 李晓平[1] 杨青岩[1] 徐英华 JING Zehui;LIU Ji;LI Xiaoping;YANG Qingyan;XU Yinghua(Department of Geriatric,Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital,Xining,Qinghai 810000,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]青海大学附属医院老年科,青海西宁810000 [2]西宁市城西区文汇路社区卫生服务中心全科医学科,青海西宁810008

出　　处：《中华全科医学》2024年第6期922-925,共4页Chinese Journal of General Practice

基　　金：青海省卫生健康委指导性计划课题(2021-wjzdx-58)。

摘　　要：目的医患沟通能力作为提升全科医师岗位胜任力的重要能力之一,是全科医师规范化培训中的重要内容,本研究探讨卡尔加里-剑桥指南(C-CG)医患沟通模式在全科医师医患沟通教学中的应用效果,为提高全科医师医患沟通能力及人文素养提供借鉴。方法选取2021年5月—2023年5月在青海大学附属医院全科医学基地参加全科规培的30名规培医师,采用随机数表法分为实验组(n=15)及对照组(n=15),对照组在临床工作期间仅接受传统医患沟通能力培训,实验组接受卡尔加里-剑桥指南指导的医患沟通能力培训,应用医患沟通效果评价量表(SEGUE量表)分别在培训前和培训后3个月、6个月、9个月对2组医师进行医患沟通能力评估。结果2组医师在接受医患沟通培训前,医患沟通能力得分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。培训后2组沟通技能成绩均较前呈显著上升趋势,且二者变化存在显著差异,随时间延长,在干预后3个月[(15.67±1.84)分vs.(11.67±2.06)分]、6个月[(19.53±1.73)分vs.(15.73±1.49)分]、9个月[(21.07±1.22)分vs.(18.20±1.70)分],这种差异更加明显;实验组在准备启动、信息收集、信息给予、理解患者、结束问诊各维度得分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论卡尔加里-剑桥指南医患沟通模式与传统医患沟通模式相比,在医患沟通评价的各维度,包括准备启动、信息收集、信息给予、理解患者、结束问诊等方面均存在明显优势。Objective Doctor-patient communication ability is one of the important skills to improve the competency of general practitioners,and it is also an important content in the general practice standardized training.This study aims to explore the application of Calgary-Cambridge guidelines doctor-patient communication model in the teaching of general practitioners'doctor-patient communication,so as to provide reference for improving the doctor-patient communication ability and humanistic quality.Methods A total of 30 general practitioners who underwent general practice standardized training in the Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected.They were divided into experimental group(n=15)and control group(n=15)by random number table method.The control group only received the traditional doctor-patient communication skills training during the clinical work,while the experimental group received the Calgary-Cambridge guideline doctor-patient communication skills training.The doctor-patient communication effectiveness evaluation scale(SEGUE)was used to evaluate the two groups of doctors before training,3 months,6 months,and 9 months after training.Results There was no significant difference in the scores of doctor-patient communication skills between the two groups before the training(P>0.05).After training,the scores of communication skills in both groups showed a significant upward trend,and there was a significant difference between the two groups.With the extension of time the difference became more obvious as the scores of communication skills in 3 months[(15.67±1.84)points vs.(11.67±2.06)points],6 months[(19.53±1.73)points vs.(15.73±1.49)points,and 9 months(21.07±1.22)points vs.(18.20±1.70)points].The scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group in the aspects of preparation and initiation,information collection,information giving,understanding patients,and ending inquiry(P<0.05).Conclusion The Calgary-Cambridge guideline doctor-pa

关 键 词：医患沟通 卡尔加里-剑桥指南 全科医师规范化培训 SEGUE量表 

分 类 号：R192.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R499[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]