检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈唤春 CHEN Huanchun(Zhenjiang Administration Institute,Zhenjiang Jiangsu,212100)
出 处:《现代基础教育研究》2024年第2期176-183,共8页Research on Modern Basic Education
基 金:国家社科基金“十四五”规划教育学一般课题“智能时代大学教学生态系统研究”(项目编号:BIA220062)。
摘 要:文章基于政策工具理论,采用内容分析法,从政策工具类型和新课程政策内容要素两个结构维度,对2017—2021年国家层面颁布的14份与普通高中新课程密切相关的政策文本进行量化分析。研究发现,普通高中新课程政策体系基本形成,但在工具选择上存在问题:使用比例失衡而权威型工具依赖较强;新课程政策内容要素差异明显,与政策工具拟合度不高;政策工具存在制度惯性,工具选择基于惯性思维等。为此,在今后新课程政策推进过程中,需要构建新课程政策工具使用的协同机制,优化新课程政策内容要素维度结构布局,构建科学合理的新课程政策工具选择机制。Based on policy tool theory and using content analysis,this study quantitatively analyzed 14 policy documents closely related to the new curriculum for ordinary high schools that are issued at the national level from 2017 to 2021.This analysis was conducted from two structural dimensions of policy tool types and the content elements of new curriculum policy.The study has found that although the new curriculum policy system in ordinary high schools has been basically formed,there still exist some problems in tool selection,like an imbalanced usage ratio and a strong reliance on authoritative tools,significant differences in the content elements of the new policy and a low fit with policy tools,and institutional inertia in policy tools with choices based on habitual thinking.Therefore,in the future promotion of the new curriculum policy,it is necessary to build a collaborative mechanism for the use of policy tools,optimize the structural layout of the policy content elements,and establish a scientific and reasonable mechanism for selecting policy tools.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7