“底层文化资本”与教育:误识、隐患及其反思  

"Bottom Cultural Capital"and Education:Misconceptions,Hidden Dangers and Reflections

作　　者：沈晓冬 林丹 SHEN Xiao-dong;LIN Dan(Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学教育学部,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《高等教育研究》2023年第12期26-35,共10页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(教育学)一般项目(BEA220043)。

摘　　要：近年来兴起的“底层文化资本说”通过深描寒门子弟所具有的“底层优势”,对传统文化资本理论中的阶层决定论进行了反驳,但“底层文化资本”概念是否成立一直争议不断。若对马克思、布迪厄、舒尔茨等人提出的“资本”概念进行理论溯源便可发现,“底层文化资本”概念仍然存在理论立场上的双重摇摆性,且不具备“资本”的相关属性,其本质是寒门子弟在穷困的成长环境中,通过自己的文化生产实践而生发的精神动力,是一种具有差别优势的“底层文化”而非“资本”。若“张冠李戴”,则会产生一系列隐患与风险。我们应明确理论立场,在澄清“底层文化资本”概念的基础上,引入综合分析视角,反思教育可为之处。The"bottom cultural capital"refutes the class determinism in the traditional cultural capital theory by deeply describing the"bottom advantage"of the children of poor families.However,the concept of"bottom cultural capital"is still controversial in recent years.If the concept of capital proposed by Marx,Bourdieu and Schulz is theoretically traced,it can be found that the concept of"bottom cultural capital"still has a double swing in theoretical standpoint and does not have the relevant attributes of"capital",Its essence is a kind of spiritual power generated by the children of poor families in the poor growth environment through their own cultural production practice.It is a"bottom culture"with differential advantages rather than"capital".If we confuse the two concepts,it will produce a series of hidden dangers and risks.

关 键 词：底层文化资本 文化生产 寒门子弟 

分 类 号：G40-052[文化科学—教育学原理] G640[文化科学—教育学]