康德本体论的对象性介质缺失及其完构  

The Absence of Object Media in Kant’s Ontology and Its Perfection

作　　者：曾永成[1] ZENG Yongcheng(College of Literature and Journalism,Chengdu University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610021,China)

机构地区：[1]成都大学文学与新闻传播学院,四川成都610021

出　　处：《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第4期45-53,共9页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：康德把“物自身”视为现象存在的本体根基,然而它凭什么能够“空”而有“灵”,以至成为所有现象得以生成的根基,尚缺少必要的形而下基元作为本体与现象之间的介质。马克思对象性关系的思想,启示并提供了本体与现象之间存在超越差异的普遍性对象性关系和必要介质的思路。怀特海有机宇宙论以宇观和缈观两极的结合实现了对存在本体的完整建构。中国古代“道”论不仅与康德“物自身”说高度会通,而且其“道气合一”论对本体存在的完构与怀特海异曲同工,还以“气物二相”说与“波粒二象”说相呼应,使本体论的完整结构得以圆融。这样完整圆融的本体论为建构“世界美学”奠定了哲学基础。Kant posits the“thing⁃in⁃itself”as the ontological foundation underlying the existence of phenomena.However,his framework lacks the necessary metaphysical intermediaries to explain how this foundation can be“empty,”yet possess“spirit,”and serve as the basis for all phenomena.Marx’s notion of objective relationships provides insight into the existence of universal and necessary media that bridge ontology and phenomena,transcending their differences.Whitehead’s organic cosmology further advances this idea by integrating cosmology with the mesocosm,achieving a comprehensive construct of ontology.The ancient Chinese concept of“Tao”closely aligns with Kant’s“thing⁃in⁃itself,”and the“integration of Tao and Qi”parallels Whitehead’s approach to perfecting ontology.Moreover,the Chinese theory of the“two phases of gas and matter”resonates with the concept of“wave⁃particle duality,”creating a harmonious and unified ontological structure.This complete and harmonious ontology lays a philosophical foundation for the construct of“world aesthetics.”

关 键 词：康德本体论 物自身 对象性介质 怀特海 道气合一 

分 类 号：B83[哲学宗教—美学]