检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈江进[1] CHEN Jiangjin(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出 处:《医学与哲学》2024年第13期78-80,F0003,共4页Medicine and Philosophy
摘 要:针对尊严能否作为生命伦理学的基础的问题,有些学者基于尊严的相对性、可压倒性与可还原性,声称尊严是一个无用的概念,因此不能为生命伦理学奠基。实际上,概念的相对性并不能成为可将其视为无用的根据。尊严绝非无用的概念,恰恰相反,尊严成为生命伦理学基础具有不可逃避性。当然,承认了尊严的有用性也并不等于主张尊严是不可压倒、不可替代、至高无上的。换言之,尊严作为生命伦理学的基础具有非唯一性,它与其他价值一起在生命伦理学的相关讨论中发挥重要作用。In response to the question of whether dignity can be served as a foundation for bioethics,some scholars claim that dignity is a useless concept based on its relativity,overridingness and reducibility and therefore cannot lay the foundation for bioethics.In fact,the relativity of concepts cannot justify its useless.Dignity is by no means a useless concept.On the contrary,dignity becomes indispensable as the foundation of bioethics.Of course,acknowledging the usefulness of dignity does not necessarily mean advocating that dignity is invincible,irreplaceable,and supreme.In other words,dignity is one of the useful foundational concepts of bioethics,along with other values,it plays an important role in the relevant discussions of bioethics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64