我国英文社科期刊意识形态话语权建设现状及提升策略  

Status and enhancement strategies of ideological discourse power in China's English social science journals

作　　者：陈星潼 陈楠[2,3] 赵爱清 CHEN Xingtong;CHEN Nan;ZHAO Aiqing(Office of Scientific Research(Academic Journal Center),Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,China;School of Business Administration,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,China;School of Marxism,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,China)

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学科研处(学术期刊中心),四川省成都市611130 [2]西南财经大学工商管理学院,四川省成都市611130 [3]西南财经大学马克思主义学院,四川省成都市611130

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2024年第6期728-736,共9页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

摘　　要：[目的]探究英文社科期刊意识形态话语权的内涵定义,分析当前我国英文社科期刊意识形态话语权建设现状,为发挥学术期刊引领作用、筑牢社会主义意识形态主阵地提供理论支撑。[方法]基于JCR收录的14种中国英文社科期刊的办刊模式、刊号获取、稿件来源、主题内容、被引频次、媒介手段等,对其意识形态话语主体、话语内容、话语效果进行研究,尤其对英文社科期刊刊载的中国有关研究内容进行量化分析,剖析当前英文社科期刊意识形态话语权建设存在的问题。[结果]在话语主体上,外部依赖和“管理真空”有待补缺;在话语内容上,评价标准和工具有待开发;在话语效果上,传播效果与媒介手段有待丰富。[结论]提升我国英文社科期刊意识形态话语权,需着力统筹刊号管理、构建管理体系、制定评价标准、建设自主平台、鼓励多元传播。[Purposes]This paper aims to explore the connotation and definition of ideological discourse power in English social science journals,analyze the status of ideological discourse power development in English social science journals in China,in order to provide a theoretical basis for academic journals to play a leading role and fortify the socialist ideology.[Methods]Based on the publishing models,CN acquisition,paper sources,themes and contents,cited frequency,and media channels of 14 English social science journals in China indexed in JCR,we examined the subjects,contents,and effects of ideological discourse.Particularly,quantitative analysis is conducted on the coverage of the studies on China's English social science journals,to dissect the current issues of ideological discourse power in this type of journal.[Findings]Regarding discourse subjects,there are problems in the external dependency and"management vacuum"that need to be addressed;concerning discourse content,the evaluation criteria and tools need further development;for discourse effects,dissemination,and media channels need to be enriched.[Conclusions]To enhance the ideological discourse power of the English social science journals in China,efforts should be made to coordinate CN management,develop management systems,establish evaluation criteria,build independent platforms,and encourage diverse dissemination.

关 键 词：英文社科期刊 意识形态话语权 话语主体 话语内容 话语效果 

分 类 号：D64[政治法律—政治学] G237.5[政治法律—中外政治制度]