《管子》之《心术下》与《内业》的篇章关系及其生命理念  

The Relationship between“Mental ArtsVol.2”and“InnerEvils”in Guanzi and Their Life Philosophy

作　　者：管宗昌 GUAN Zong-chang(School of Liberal Arts,Shantou University,Shantou,Guangdong 515063)

机构地区：[1]汕头大学文学院,广东汕头515063

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第1期47-55,95,共10页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“《管子》的生命理念与文章书写研究”(21BZW189)。

摘　　要：《管子》的《心术上》《心术下》《白心》《内业》四篇,是以存心养神为主的道论文章,经常作为一组而成为研究对象,但《心术下》与《内业》关系问题至今仍争论不少。要解决这一问题需要深入文本、综合分析。通过分析发现:《心术下》和《内业》是不同于经传关系的互存关系,各有定位和主旨。同时,《内业》体现出极强的理论系统性,尤其在“精气”生命观方面建构了系统的生命哲学,是对之前生命理念的进升。The four Taoist essays in Guanzi,including“Mental ArtsVol.1”,“Mental ArtsVol.2”,“White Heart”and“InnerEvils”,are mainly focused on cultivating and nourishing the mind.They are often grouped for research purposes,and the relationship between“Mental Arts Vol.2”and“Inner Evils”is still on controversy.To solve this problem,it is necessary to delve into the text and conduct comprehensive analysis.Through analysis,it is found that“Mental Arts Vol.2”and“Inner Evils”are of interdependent relationship that is different from the Jing Zhuan relationship,each essay with its own positioning and theme.Meanwhile,“Inner Evils”embodies a strong theoretical systematicity,especially in constructing a systematic philosophy of life in the aspect of“JingQi”,which is an advancement of the previous concept of life.

关 键 词：《管子》 《心术下》 《内业》 生命理念 

分 类 号：B226.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]