南宋浙东学派经典研究的史学视角  

The Eastern Zhejiang School’s Studies of Classics from Historical Perspective in the Southern Song Dynasty

作　　者：施建雄[1] 马珂 Shi Jianxiong;Ma Ke

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学历史文化学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《史学史研究》2024年第2期54-64,共11页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：中唐以降各种时代因素导致对传统儒学中经史关系的反思与重构,影响直至北宋。随着疑古辨伪风气的形成,对经典不再盲从,经学著作由史学视角切入进行研究成为可能。南宋时以“事功”为主要特点的浙东学派吕祖谦、薛季宣、陈傅良、叶适与陈亮等人就经传从史学角度给予发掘与探索,不仅“视经为史”,而且“以史论经”,这是建立在对经史关系新认识基础之上的结果;他们重视将通经致用与史学的经世功能相结合,则体现了学科属性变化之后服务于社会方向的一致。通过对浙东学派经史探索视角转换的总结,可以进一步丰富对古代经史关系的认识,从而加深对传统学术发展演变的形式和路径方面的研究。Since the middle of Tang Dynasty, various factors led to the reflection and reconstruction in the study of the relationship between traditional Confucianism and historiography, which had an influence on the studies of Northern Song Dynasty. Affected by the thought of doubting antiquity and criticizing falsehood, scholars didn't follow the classics blindly, so it is possible to study classics from the perspective of historiography. In the Southern Song Dynasty, the scholars of Eastern Zhejiang School, such as, Lv Zuqian, Xue Jixuan, Chen Fuliang, Ye Shi and Chen Liang, whose main characteristics were “pragmatism”, explored classics from the perspective of historiography. They not only “regarded classics as history”, but also “discussed classics with history”, which was because of the new understanding of the relationship between classics and historiography. They attached importance to the combination of theory of “utilizing classics in practices” and the practical function of historiography, which reflects their practical attitude. Through a study of the transformattitudes of the perspectives of the Eastern Zhejiang School, the understanding of the relation between historiography and classics in ancient China is enriched, and the research on the forms and paths of the development of traditional scholarship could be deepened.

关 键 词：儒家经典 史学视角 浙东学派 通经致用 史学经世 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]