检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘文森 吴江峰 LIU Wensen;WU Jiangfeng(Department of Teacher Education,South China Normal University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510631,China)
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学教师教育学部,广东广州510631
出 处:《教育参考》2024年第6期53-60,66,共9页Education Approach
基 金:2022年度国家社会科学基金教育学重大项目“新时代高质量教师教育体系建设及师资供需配给研究”(项目编号:VFA220007);广东省中小学校长联合会2022年度委托课题“广东省中小学校长专业发展报告”(项目编号:SKHX2022090)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:校长专业标准是高质量建设校长队伍的行动指南。本文通过比较分析中美英三国现行中小学校长专业标准发现:三国标准出台背景各不相同,但都致力于校长专业能力的提升;三国标准制定过程均由公共组织主导,但制定方法和特征大相径庭;三国标准基本理念和制定目的各异,但都反映出各国的战略考量与本土化实践;我国的标准暂未修订,美英两国的标准修订与内容更新已成常态化举措。为加快教育强国建设,打造与时俱进的新时代高质量中小学校长专业标准,应健全职责要求,强化标准的功能性和指导作用;重视循证方法,增强标准的科学性和实践价值;建立更新机制,保障标准的前沿性和可持续性。The professional standard for school headmasters is a guide to action for building high-quality principalship.As we embark on a new journey,the two sets of standards in China have reached a point where they need to be revised.A comparative analysis of the existing professional standards for primary and secondary school headmasters in China,the United States and the United Kingdom reveals that:the three countries have different backgrounds for the introduction of the standards,but all of them are committed to the improvement of the professional competence of headmasters;the process of formulating the standards in the three countries is dominated by public organisations,but the methodology and characteristics of the formulation are very different;the basic concepts and purposes of the standards in the three countries are different,but all of them reflect the strategic considerations and localised practices in the three countries;the standards of our country have not yet been revised,but the revision and content update of the standards of the two countries have become regular.In order to accelerate the construction of a strong educational country and create a new era of high-quality professional standards for primary and secondary school headmasters that keep pace with the times,we should improve the requirements of responsibilities and strengthen the functionality and guiding role of the standards;attach importance to evidence-based methods to enhance the scientific and practical value of the standards;and establish an updating mechanism to guarantee the novelty and sustainability of the standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49