检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈红娟 Chen Hongjuan
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《中共党史研究》2024年第3期113-122,共10页CPC History Studies
摘 要:中共思想史研究在历史分期与脉络、人物思想与经典文本等方面成果丰硕,但研究对象主要集中在人物与文本,存在文本意义阐释超出合理限度、思想生成过程研究有所缺失、思想交锋与容受研究相对薄弱等倾向。为此,可以通过借鉴文本学研究方法来深化中共思想史研究。一是要研究文本谱系中思想的聚合与跃升,观照思想在不同类型文本中行进的整体性与连续性,辨明思想在同类文本中的竞争性与独特性。二是要研究文本流通中思想的撒播与容受,厘清中共塑造思想、实现底层社会动员的艰辛过程。Studies of the intellectual history of the CPC have yielded rich achievements in the study of the historical periods and their contexts,the thoughts of individuals,and the classic texts.However,the focus of research has primarily been on individuals and texts,leading to trends such as excessive interpretations of the textual meaning,insufficient studies of the process of ideological formation,and relatively weak research on the acceptance of ideological conflicts.Therefore,it is possible to deepen the study of the intellectual history of the CPC by borrowing from textual studies methods.First,it is essential to explore the aggregation and emergence of ideas within the textual genealogy,paying attention to the integrity and continuity of ideas in different types of texts and distinguishing between the competitiveness and uniqueness of ideas in similar texts.Second,it is crucial to study the dissemination and acceptance of ideas through textual circulation,elucidating the CPC’s arduous process of shaping ideas and achieving grassroots mobilization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49