技术民主化之可能与不可能——芬伯格技术民主化思想的缺陷及其补充  

Possibility and Impossibility of Technological Democratization and Impossibility of Technological Democratization-Defects and Supplements of Feinberg's Democratic Thought on Technology

作　　者：王云霞[1] WANG Yunxia(School of Philosophy,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学学院,西安710119

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期22-28,共7页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

摘　　要：芬伯格的技术民主化思想发轫于对技术工具论和技术实体论的批判,致力于使初级工具化向次级工具化转变,并鼓励公众通过技术论争、创新式对话和参与式设计以及创造性挪用等路径推动技术的民主化。这些思想充满洞见,但也存在强制把现代性的宏观选择还原为技术的微观可选择、忽略公众参与技术设计以促进技术民主之不确定性与复杂性、无视技术选择难逃人类中心之窠臼、搁置正义伦理空场等缺陷。因此,我们需从现代性的重建、国际经济政治秩序的重构、保持人类中心与自然中心间的必要张力,以及重塑基于承认、参与和能力的正义伦理等方面入手加以补充。Feinberg's idea of technological democratization originated from the criticism of technological instrumental-ism and technological entity theory,committed to transforming primary instrumentalization into secondary instru-mentalization,and encouraging the public to promote technological democratization through technological debates,innovative dialogue,participatory design,and creative appropriation.These ideas are full of profound insights,but there are also shortcomings such as strongly reducing the macro choices of modernity to the micro choices of technol-ogy,neglecting the uncertainty and complexity of public participation in technological design to promote technologi-cal democracy,ignoring technological choices that cannot escape the stereotype of human centeredness,and shelving the empty space of justice and ethics.It needs to be supplemented by the reconstruction of modernity,the reconstruc-tion of the international economic and political order,maintaining the necessary tension between the human center and the natural center,and reshaping the ethics of justice based on recognition,participation,and ability.

关 键 词：芬伯格 技术民主化 困境 现代性 破解 

分 类 号：B712[哲学宗教—外国哲学]