北京大学医学部循证医学课程选课研究生课前学情调查  

Analysis of pre-course learning situation of postgraduates in the selection of evidence-based medicine course at Peking University Health Science Center

作　　者：章萌 刘凤琪 武珊珊[3,4] 吴涛 孙凤[1,2,5,6] ZHANG Meng;LIU Fengqi;WU Shanshan;WU Tao;SUN Feng(School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases(Peking University),Ministry of Education,Beijing 100191,China;Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases,Beijing 100050,China;Peking University Center for Evidence Based Medical and Clinical Research,Beijing 100191,China;Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830017,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学公共卫生学院,北京100191 [2]重大疾病流行病学教育部重点实验室(北京大学),北京100191 [3]首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院临床流行病学与循证医学研究室,北京100050 [4]国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心,北京100050 [5]北京大学循证医学中心,北京100191 [6]新疆医科大学,乌鲁木齐830017

出　　处：《医学新知》2024年第7期825-832,共8页New Medicine

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(72074011);中国中医药循证医学中心业务研究室主任专项(2020YJSZX-2);北京大学医学部研究生课程思政建设项目(北医[2024]部研字3号)。

摘　　要：目的了解北京大学医学部网状Meta分析课程选课研究生课程前基础知识掌握、学习态度等学情情况。方法以2021—2023年选修《证据整合及应用:网状Meta分析》课程的研究生为研究对象,通过问卷评估选课研究生课程前对网状Meta分析的相关知识掌握、学习态度等情况,使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验对硕士研究生和博士研究生的差异进行组间比较。结果共84位研究生参与调查,其中硕士研究生54人,博士研究生30人。课程前选课研究生均具备一定的文献检索、阅读能力,硕士研究生和博士研究生间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。选课研究生对基本术语均有一定了解,但是对Meta分析的具体应用等知识掌握相对薄弱,不了解的比例为46.67%~61.11%。与博士研究生相比,硕士研究生对系统综述与传统综述的区别(P=0.014)、实施循证医学的基本步骤(P<0.001)理解较差,两组间差异有统计学意义。选课研究生整体具有较强的学习主动性和求知欲。结论《证据整合及应用:网状Meta分析》选课研究生文献检索及阅读能力较优,且准备以认真的态度进行此课程的学习,但仍需提升对Meta分析相关内容的掌握程度,调查结果为课程教学内容和模式的持续改进提供了指导。Objective To understand the basic evidence-based knowledge mastery of postgraduates before the course of the network Meta-analysis of Peking University Health Science Center.Methods This study focused on graduate students who attended the Evidence Integration and Application:Network Meta-analysis Course from 2021 to 2023.Questionnaires were used to assess students'knowledge of network Meta-Analysis and attitudes related to the course,and comparisons were made between master's and doctoral students using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.Results A total of 84 students participated in the survey,including 54 master's students and 30 doctoral students.Students who enrolled in the course had a certain level of competence in literature searching and reading skills before taking the course,with no statistically significant differences between master's and doctoral students(P>0.05).Students had a basic understanding of fundamental course terms,but displayed relative weaknesses in the knowledge of the specific application of Meta-analysis,with proportions ranging from 46.67%to 61.11%of students reporting unfamiliarity with these aspects.Compared to doctoral students,master's students exhibited a reduced comprehension of differences between systematic review and traditional review(P=0.014),and basic steps to implement evidence-based medicine(P<0.001),the differences between the two groups were statistically significant.Graduate students who selected this course generally had initiative and curiosity of learning.Conclusion Students who chose this course demonstrate superior literature search and reading abilities,and they are prepared to approach this course with a serious attitude.However,there is still a need to improve their understanding of Meta-analysis related content.The results provide reference of the improvement of the teaching content and model of this course.

关 键 词：循证医学 META分析 混合式教学法 课程前评价 学情调查 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生] G643[文化科学—高等教育学]