检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王姝燕 WANG Shuyan
机构地区:[1]山西师范大学外国语学院,山西太原030031
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2024年第2期61-71,147,共12页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基 金:山西省教育科学“十四五”规划课题“大学生学习投入促进外语学习的路径研究”(项目编号:GH-220464);山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目“基于项目式学术英语写作培养学生创新能力的实践与研究”(项目编号:J20230589)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:协作学习投入是影响同伴互动质量和语言学习效果的重要因素,但尚未得到学界应有的关注。本研究基于问卷调查、小组录音和写作文本考察了72名大学英语学习者在合作写作任务中的协作学习投入状态及其语言学习表现。研究发现:(1)协作学习投入具有差异性、交互性、集体性、动态性等特征,且不同个体和小组协作投入类型的群体特征差异明显;(2)协作学习投入对互动过程中语言注意和语言问题的解决有积极影响;(3)高水平的协作学习投入有利于学习者语言水平发展。研究建议教师参考协作学习投入群体特征开展教学实践,促进合作写作效果。Although collaborative engagement is a crucial predictor of peer interaction and language learning,it has been overlooked by researchers.This study investigated the collaborative engagement of 72 non-English major students and its impact on their language learning performance in collaborative writing tasks through a questionnaire survey,audio-recorded discussions,and written texts.The results reveal that(1)collaborative engagement is characterized by divergence,interactivity,collectivity and dynamism;there are obvious differences in the group characteristics possessed by different types of individual and collaborative group engagement;(2)collaborative engagement has positive effects on language noticing and linguistic problem-solving during peer interaction;(3)high-level collaborative engagement is good for learners'sustained language development.The present study suggests that teachers should consider learners'group characteristics of collaborative engagement in teaching practice to enhance the effectiveness of collaborative writing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.162.109