作为问题的“世界文学”——重审大变局下的“世界文学”模式与格局  

“World Literature” as a Problem: The Model and Pattern of “World Literature” under the Re-examination of the Great Changes

作　　者：王宁[1,2] 陈众议 方维规[5] 宋炳辉 张辉 刘洪涛 张帆[9] Wang Ning;Chen Zhongyi;Fang Weigui;Song Binghui;Zhang Hui;Liu Hongtao;Zhang Fan

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学 [2]欧洲科学院 [3]中国社会科学院 [4]湖南师范大学 [5]上海交通大学人文学院 [6]上海外国语大学文学研究院 [7]北京大学中文系 [8]北京师范大学文学院 [9]上海外国语大学文学研究院、中国话语与世界文学研究中心

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2024年第6期4-33,177,共31页Exploration and Free Views

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“新时代马克思主义中国化的艺术理论与实践研究”(23ZD03)阶段性成果;教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“‘中国故事’在世界文学中的征引阐释及启示研究”(20JZD046)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：从人类命运共同体和百年未有之大变局的维度重审“世界文学”,它便不仅是一个对象,而更成为一个问题。从歌德奠基性地提出“世界文学”概念并为其追溯以欧洲经典文学为基底的谱系开始,世界文学便不可避免地形成一种欧洲版本。近两百年来,世界文学虽经演化发展,旧的欧洲中心主义也发展为另一种新的西方中心主义,但包括中国在内的广阔的东方文学在其中尚未获得应有的重视与位置。How is it possible for “world literature” to emerge from the Western centric model today? How to conduct interventional research on Chinese literature towards world literature? How does “Chinese narrative” participate in the knowledge production of “world literature”? How can Chinese scholars voice their own opinions? To answer the above questions, we invite experts from relevant fields to explore and re-examine the model and pattern of “world literature” under the great changes. Professor Wang Ning pointed out that Chinese scholars should actively participate in international theoretical discussions, starting from a Chinese perspective, and redrawing the world literary landscape through dialogue with international peers. Professor Chen Zhongyi pointed out that when discussing world literature, more attention should be paid to the literary essence, history, and common sense, the voices of disadvantaged nations and developing countries, and the new cosmopolitanism and world literature nurtured by new times and historical opportunities. Professor Fang Weigui pointed out that efforts should be made to avoid “globalization” becoming a mere idle discourse, and to focus on how literature and culture have been involved in the process of globalization in the past and present, as well as how to respond to the postmodern order of multinational groups. Professor Song Binghui pointed out that world literature is not simply the sum of all world literature, but a constantly evolving plural. It is a creative, cross-cultural, and unfinished literary practice and event that can be used to conduct a “genealogical study” of world literature. Professor Zhang Hui believes that only by starting from specific texts, phenomena, and the specific history of literature itself can we reveal the infinite possibilities that literature provides for us to understand and showcase the complexity and richness of the world. Professor Liu Hongtao pointed out that this practice of deWestern centrism can serve as a reference an

关 键 词：东方文学 欧洲中心主义 经典文学 西方中心主义 人类命运共同体 演化发展 大变局 重审 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]