检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张慢慢[1,2,3] 李鑫 边菡 汪强 臧传丽 闫国利[1,2,3] 白学军 Zhang Manman;Li Xin;Bian Han;Wang Qiang;Zang Chuanli;Yan Guoli;Bai Xuejun(Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin,300387;Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin,300387;Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students'Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin,300387;Ziyang College of Environmental Science and Technology,Sichuan,641300)
机构地区:[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300387 [2]天津师范大学心理学部,天津300387 [3]学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津300387 [4]资阳环境科技职业学院,四川641300
出 处:《心理科学》2024年第4期788-794,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31800920,31571122)的资助。
摘 要:在熟练的中文阅读中,不同阅读速度读者提取文本信息的范围(即知觉广度)是否存在差异?为解决该问题,本研究从熟练读者群体中选取快速读者与慢速读者,结合眼动技术和移动窗口范式比较两组读者在不同窗口(R0、L1R1、L1R2、L1R3、L1R4、FL)下阅读句子时的眼动模式。结果显示,在保证阅读理解准确的前提下,快速读者比慢速读者的知觉广度更大,符合E-Z读者模型的语言效率假说,支持个体差异性观点。Previous studies have revealed that perceptual span,mainly the right range of the fixation in parafovea,increases with the development of reading skill(Häikiöet al.,2009;Rayner,1986;Yan et al.,2018).As foveal lexical processing is highly automatic for high skilled readers,more attention is allocated to parafoveal region,leading to highly efficient parafoveal processing and a larger extent of parafoveal preview compared to less skilled readers(Rayner,2010).However,whether or not the perceptual span varies as reading speed during skilled reading is controversial.It is argued that individual differences in linguistic processing cause different reading speeds among readers which might be stable or increasing across lifespan(i.e.,the nonuniformity view;Sperlich et al.,2016;Reichle et al.,2013).Thus,fast readers would have wider perceptual span than slow readers.In contrast,according to the uniformity assumption(Andrews,2015),all skilled readers use similar reading processes and only show differences in degrees rather than types(Ashby et al.,2005).Therefore,fast readers would extract useful information from parafovea extending to the same area with slow readers.Research in alphabetic language proved that,during skilled reading,high skilled or fast readers had wider perceptual span than less skilled or slow readers,providing evidence in support of the former claim(Rayner et al.,2010;Veldre&Andrews,2014).Unlike alphabetic language,Chinese script is densely packed with no space between words,resulting in deeply parafoveal processing(Li&Pollatsek,2020;Zang et al.,2019).Notably,there was no differences in relation to the amount of parafoveal preview between fast and slow readers during skilled Chinese reading(Zhang et al.,2020).However,it is unclear whether the two groups obtain parafoveal information from similar preview span or not.Therefore,the current study was to investigate this issue by using moving window paradigm(McConkie&Rayner,1975).Ninety sentences were created,each of which was displayed in a window size of e
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222