检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩素平 袁超 李新 付正 HAN Suping;YUAN Chao;LI Xin;FU Zheng(Department of Pharmacy,Shandong Medical College,Shandong,Jinan 250002,China)
机构地区:[1]山东医学高等专科学校药学系,山东济南250002
出 处:《中国医药科学》2024年第14期37-41,共5页China Medicine And Pharmacy
基 金:山东省文化和旅游研究课题[22WL(Y)218];山东医学高等专科学校教育教学改革研究立项项目(XJJG202316)。
摘 要:目的构建课程思政导向的教师课堂教学质量评价体系,推动课程思政质量提升与效果改进。方法基于国家政策法规和调研结果设计评价指标,运用层次分析(AHP)法确定权重,运用模糊综合评价法建立评价模型。结果构建了由2个一级指标、6个二级指标组成的权重分配合理、方法科学的评价体系,一级指标权重排名中知识传授大于价值引领,二级指标权重排名前三位的依次是教学内容、教学实施和行为示范,并运用模型进行实证评价。结论该评价体系科学、可行、简便,为教师教学质量评价和人才培养提供有力支撑。Objective To construct an ideology and politics curriculum oriented quality evaluation system in teacher’s classroom teaching,so as to improve the quality elevation and effect promotion of ideology and politics curriculum.Methods Based on national policies and regulations and investigation results,the evaluation indices were designed,the weight was determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP)method,and the evaluation model was established by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.Results An evaluation system with reasonable weight distribution and scientific methods was constructed,which consisted of 2 first-level indices and 6 second-level indices.In the weight ranking of the first-level indices,knowledge transfer was greater than value guidance,while the top three weights of the second-level indices were teaching content,teaching implementation and behavior demonstration in turn,and the model was used for empirical evaluation.Conclusion This evaluation system is scientific,feasible and simple,which provides favorable support for quality evaluation and talent training on teachers’teaching.
关 键 词:课程思政 课堂教学质量评价 层次分析法 模糊综合评价法
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145