远程口译环境下视译与有稿同传的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Sight Translation and Simultaneous Interpreting with Text in Remote Interpreting Settings

作　　者：王羽迪 WANG Yudi(Peking University)

机构地区：[1]北京大学

出　　处：《翻译界》2024年第2期113-124,共12页Translation Horizons

摘　　要：本研究采用实验研究法,以北京大学日语口译方向MTI学生为研究对象,探讨远程口译环境下视译与有稿同传的质量差异及其影响因素。研究设计了视译和有稿同传两种口译任务,采集学生的口译音频并进行专家评分。同时,研究通过问卷调查了解学生对远程口译实验的主观评价。研究发现:(1)在远程环境下,学生的视译质量显著优于有稿同传;(2)个体在两种口译模式下的得分呈正相关;(3)远程环境的技术和环境因素可能加剧有稿同传中听觉信息的干扰效应,影响口译质量;(4)学生总体上认为远程口译实验有助于提升口译技能和适应远程工作模式,但也指出了远程环境的局限性。本研究丰富了口译认知研究的实证基础,为优化远程口译教学和实践提供了建议,具有一定的理论和实践意义。This study adopts an experimental approach to investigate the quality differences and influencing factors between sight translation and simultaneous interpreting with text in remote interpreting settings,with a focus on Japanese-Chinese MTI students at Peking University.The study designs two interpreting tasks,i.e.,sight translation and simultaneous interpreting with text,collects students'interpreting audios,and conducts expert scoring.Meanwhile,the study employs questionnaires to understand students'subjective evaluation of the remote interpreting experiment.The findings reveal that:(1)in remote settings,students'sight translation quality is significantly better than simultaneous interpreting with text;(2)individuals'scores in the two interpreting modes are positively correlated;(3)technical and environmental factors in remote settings may exacerbate the interference effect of auditory information in simultaneous interpreting with text,thus affecting interpreting quality;(4)students generally believe that the remote interpreting experiment helps improve their interpreting skills and adapt to remote working modes,but they also point out the limitations of remote environments.This study enriches the empirical basis of interpreting cognitive research and provides suggestions for optimizing remote interpreting teaching and practice,which has certain theoretical and practical significance.

关 键 词：远程口译 日汉口译 实证分析 视译 翻译教学 

分 类 号：H059[语言文字—语言学]