检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫淑敏 贾青妹 张皓月 张译心 付昕[1] 陈明轩 王爱英[1] Yan Shumin;Jia Qingmei;Zhang Haoyue;Zhang Yixin;Fu Xin;Chen Mingxuan;Wang Aiying(Binzhou Medical University,Yantai 264003,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]滨州医学院,山东烟台264003
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2024年第6期62-63,66,共3页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:2020年度医学教育研究课题(2020B-N12413);第三批山东高校辅导员领航工作室建设项目;2021年山东省社会科学规划研究项目(21CMYJ02)。
摘 要:目的:了解当前辅导员的专业背景与考核成绩的相关性,为各医学院校设置科学合理的辅导员招聘条件、优化辅导员队伍结构、健全辅导员培养培训机制、提高辅导员队伍水平提供可靠的数据支撑。方法:以医学院校辅导员自身专业与所带学生专业是否一致为多水平分组变量,采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验对辅导员考核名次的总体分布以及各组间差异进行多重比较。结果:总体分析显示,H=9.601,P<0.05,一致组、思政组与不一致组3个组别辅导员考核名次总体差异具有统计学意义;经多组秩和检验的多重比较显示,专业一致组辅导员考核名次明显落后于不一致组(P<0.05),思政组与其他组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:3个组之间辅导员考核位次存在差异,其中专业不一致组辅导员的考核位次明显优于一致组,思政组考核位次与其他组间无差异。Purpose:To understand the correlation between the professional background of counselors and examination scores,providing reliable data support for establishing scientific and reasonable recruitment conditions for counselors,optimizing the structure of counselor teams,improving the training mechanism for counselors,and enhancing the overall level of counselor teams in medical colleges.Methods:Using whether the counselor s own professional background matches the students major as a multi-level grouping variable,Kruskal-Wallis H test was employed to analyze the overall distribution of counselor assessment rankings and perform multiple comparisons between groups.Results:The overall analysis showed H=9.601,P<0.05,indicating statistically significant differences in counselor assessment rankings among the three groups:consistent group,ideological and political group,and inconsistent group.Multiple comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U test revealed that counselors whose professional background was inconsistent with the students major performed significantly better in assessments compared to those in the consistent group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in assessment rankings between the ideological and political group and the other groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:There are differences in counselor assessment rankings among the three groups,with counselors whose professional background is inconsistent with the students major performing better than those in the consistent group.There was no significant difference in assessment rankings between the ideological and political group and the other groups.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3