检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白云 邓阳[1] BAI Yun;DENG Yang(Institute of Chemical Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China;Tianjin Municipal Educational Admission and Examinations Authority,Tianjin 300387,China)
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学化学教育研究所,湖北武汉430079 [2]天津市教育招生考试院,天津300387
出 处:《化学教育(中英文)》2024年第17期14-21,共8页Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基 金:华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(项目编号:CCNUTEIII2024-11,CCNUTEI2023-07)。
摘 要:科学解释和科学论证作为重要的科学实践方式,是帮助学生体验相对复杂的化学问题解决过程、建构化学知识的关键。基于对科学解释和科学论证内涵及关系的分析,建立了关于高中化学教科书中呈现科学解释和科学论证方式的分析框架,并对我国不同时期人教版的部分高中化学教科书的部分内容进行了分析。通过研究,阐释了高中化学教科书建构科学解释和科学论证的方式,并结合知识类型、话语显隐性和话语开放性等3个维度说明了科学解释与科学论证在高中化学教科书中的建构特点。据此,阐明了编写高中化学教科书的启示。As important ways of scientific practice,scientific explanation and scientific argumentation are the keys to help students experience the process of solving relatively complex chemical problems and constructing chemical knowledge.Based on the analysis of the connotation and the relationship between scientific explanation and scientific argumentation,an analytical framework for the presentation of scientific explanation and scientific argumentation in senior high school chemistry textbooks was constructed,and some contents of textbooks published by People's Education Press in different periods were analyzed.Through the research,the ways of constructing scientific explanation and scientific argumentation in senior high school chemistry textbooks were clarified,and the constructing characteristics were expounded from three dimensions of knowledge type,the explicitness and implicitness of discourse,and the openness of discourse.Accordingly,the implications related to senior high school chemistry textbook writing were clarified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49