检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘桂锋 LIU Guifeng(College of Education,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,Hunan 410128)
出 处:《上海教育评估研究》2024年第4期19-24,79,共7页Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基 金:湖南省教育科学“十四五”规划2023年度重点课题“学术职业管理视域中的高校教师评价制度研究”(ND2433346)。
摘 要:数字技术已成为助推高校教学质量评价改革的利器,有效地促进了评价主体移位、评价内容革新、评价方式变革和评价功能转向。然而,受数字时代的数字规训、算法陷阱、技术至上思维和数据采集的影响,高校教学质量评价存在评价主体性消解、评价科学性悬置、评价价值迷失和评价伦理失范等风险。对此,未来需要树立数据治理思维,建立双向平等的评价关系;突围数字技术囿限,开拓智能科学的评价实践;坚守数字价值理性,遵循以人为本的价值导向;聚焦数据伦理规约,构建数字向善的评价体系。Digital technology has become a powerful tool to promote the reform of teaching quality evaluation in universities,effectively promoting the displacement of evaluation subjects,the innovation of evaluation content,the reform of evaluation methods and the transformation of evaluation functions.However,due to the influence of digital discipline,algorithm traps,technology-oriented thinking and data collection in the digital age,there are risks in the evaluation of teaching quality in universities,such as the dissolution of evaluation subjectivity,the suspension of evaluation science,the disorientation of evaluation value and the anomie of evaluation ethics.In this regard,it is necessary to establish a data governance mindset and establish a two-way equal evaluation relationship in the future.It needs to break through the limitations of digital technology and develop the intelligent and scientific evaluation practice,adhere to the rationality of digital value and follow the people-oriented value orientation,and focus on data ethics and build an evaluation system for digital goodness.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学] G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15