检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴安宇[1] Wu Anyu
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学音乐学院
出 处:《中国文化研究》2024年第3期53-63,共11页Chinese Culture Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“先秦乐学文献整理与研究”(17ZDA250)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:“歌诗必类”是《诗经》学核心观念。两千余年来,以杜解孔疏中的“义类说”为核心,围绕诗义层面产生了丰硕的经义训释成果。但基于用乐层面的探求仍不够具体和完整,使得“歌诗必类”这一双维度的诗用观念阐释出现了“诗存乐亡”的瓶颈。通过梳理周秦文献并佐以存见《诗经》乐谱文献发现,《诗经》用乐在乐类、乐次、乐仪、宫调等层面普遍存在规定性和等级性。“各从义类、分乐序之”是一种新的诠释维度,强调在阐释“歌诗必类”观念时需注重文学之义与音乐之用的双重结合。“Singing the poetry should be fit”is a core concept in the studies of the Book of Songs.For over two thousand years,the opinion of yilei in comments of Du Yu and Kong Yingda has centered on the meaning of poetry,yielding significant interpretative achievements.However,the exploration based on the musical level remains insufficient and incomplete,leading to a bottleneck which refers to the situation that“poetry exists but music is lost”in the interpretation of the dual-dimensional concept of“singing the poetry should be fit.”According to documents from the Zhou and Qin dynasties,as well as the extant musical score documents of the Book of Songs,prescriptivity and hierarchy are ubiquitous among terms such as music genres,music order,music rituals,and music tunes.As a new dimension of interpretation,“categorizing according to meaning and arranging by the principles of music”highlights the necessity of combining literary meaning with music use in the interpretation of“sing the poetry should be fit.”
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30