感知过去,书写历史:斯蒂芬·巴恩与凯伦·朗的对话  

The Sense of the Past and the Writing of History:Stephen Bann in Conversation with Karen Lang

作　　者：斯蒂芬·巴恩 凯伦·朗 陈书焕(译) Stephen Bann;Karen Lang;CHEN Shuhuan(University of Bristol,Bristol BS81QU;College of Arts and Media,Tongji University,Shanghai 200086)

机构地区：[1]布里斯托大学,布里斯托BS81QU [2]华威大学,考文垂CV47AL [3]同济大学艺术与传媒学院,上海200086

出　　处：《文化艺术研究》2024年第4期97-109,116,共14页Studies in Culture and Art

摘　　要：艺术史的“历史感知”(sense of the past)如何形成和发展?“后退几步”何以作为审视20世纪艺术准则?现代主义和后现代主义的关系是“断裂”的吗?尼采曾经提出对历史的态度有怀古式的(antiquarian)、纪念式的(monumental)和批判式的(critical)。这三种都不完全正确,也不完全错误。维柯的螺旋式历史观曾经把反复回到原点的回环运动看作推动历史发展的根本要素之一。如果从空间角度考察螺旋运动,那么螺旋式的历史不仅涉及某个时间点、某个时候的地点,还涉及空间。空间可以有时间属性。由此需要思考“空间再现”“唤起过去”时的“牛耕式转行书写”;思考“器物”(apparatus)对人性造成怎样的影响;思考“奇珍”(curiosity)如何令物品“回望”人类,从而不仅成为一个历史概念,更成为一种推动性概念,一种看待和思考事物的方式;思考“从事媒介批评的古物学家”意味什么;进而思考“历史写作”何以可以视为一种“历史诗学”。How did the sense of the past emerge and develop in art history?How could Nietzsche's"take a few steps back"serve as a principle for examining 20^(th)-century art?Are there truly"short breaks"between modernism and postmodernism?Nietzsche proposed three possible positions in relation to history:the antiquarian,the monumental,and the critical;none of these is entirely good or bad.Giambattista Vico sees ricorso as one of the fundamental motivating factors of history.If we think of it in terms of space,this kind of history concerns not only points or places in time but also spaces.These spaces can embody different temporalities.Therefore,we should think of spatial representation,invoking the past as a process of the boustrophedon,considering what happens to humanity in the face of the apparatus,and viewing"curiosity"as a relation that enables things of the world to look back—not only as a historical concept but also as a motivating way of seeing.We should also consider what it means to be a"media-critical antiquarian"and why the writing of history could become historical poetics.

关 键 词：斯蒂芬·巴恩 历史感知 空间再现 奇珍 历史诗学 艺术史 

分 类 号：J110.9[艺术—艺术理论]