艺术概论课程专创融合教学改革研究  

Research on the Innovation and Integration Teaching Reform of Art Introduction Course

作　　者：赵若菲 Zhao Ruofei(Xi’an Traffic Engineering Institute,Xi’an 710300,China)

机构地区：[1]西安交通工程学院,西安710300

出　　处：《黑龙江科学》2024年第17期128-130,共3页Heilongjiang Science

基　　金：2024年专创融合“金课”与专创融合“金师”团队培育建设项目(ZC2024-26)。

摘　　要：通过问卷调查法了解艺术概论专创融合课程的教学改革现状。结果表明,艺术概论专创融合课程的教学效果处于中等偏上水平,说明学生对课程教学改革持较高的肯定态度。从各维度来看,顶层设计、创新创业教学、实践教学和专创融合教学效果均高于理论中值,但创新创业教学方面还有待加强。艺术概论专创融合课程教学效果在学生学习成绩上存在显著性差异,其中90~100分的学生均值最高,70~79分的学生对课程教学效果的评价相对较低,且仅创新创业教学在学习成绩上存在显著性差异。文科类和理工类学生对艺术概论专创融合教学效果的评价在同一层次,专业差异并不会影响学生对艺术概论专创融合教学改革的认知和看法。The study analyzes the teaching reform of the art introduction specialized innovation integration course with questionnaire survey method.The results show that the teaching effect of the course is above the medium level,which indicates that students have a positive attitude towards the course teaching reform.From the perspective of various dimensions,the effect of top-level design,innovation and entrepreneurship teaching,practical teaching,and specialized innovation and entrepreneurship integration teaching is higher than the theoretical median value,but the innovation and entrepreneurship teaching needs to be strengthened.There are significant differences in the teaching effect of specialized integration courses in Introduction to Art,among which students with 90 to 100 points have the highest mean value,while students with 70 to 79 points have relatively low evaluation of the teaching effect.There is significant difference only in the innovation and entrepreneurship teaching of learning achievement.Students of liberal arts,and science and engineering have the same evaluation on the teaching effect of Introduction to Art,and the difference of majors does not affect students’cognition and views on the teaching reform of Introduction to Art.

关 键 词：艺术概论 专创融合 教学改革 顶层设计 创新创业教学 实践教学 学习成绩 专业 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]