检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡唯哲 HU Weizhe
出 处:《外语界》2024年第4期42-48,共7页Foreign Language World
基 金:教育部中外语言交流合作中心国际中文教育研究重大课题“国际中文教材评价指标体系构建”(编号21YHZD05);国家语委重点科研项目“‘中文+职业技能’教学资源建设研究”(编号ZDI145-35)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:国外ESL教材评价研究与实践起步较早,能为中国外语教材评价实践提供重要启示。本文梳理了近50年来国外ESL教材评价量表的演进历程与典型特征。ESL教材评价量表编制经历了起步期、发展期和繁荣期三个阶段,呈现出理论基础向精准化迈进、评价要素朝适切化发展、评价方法向动态化演变的特征。我国外语教材评价应搭建主干突出、旁支清晰的树形理论支撑体系,构建指标适切、层级细分的教材评价要素系统,打造科技赋能、动静结合的评价反馈优化链条,以提升外语教材评价和编写质量。The research and practice of ESL textbook evaluation in foreign countries made an early start,which has important implications for the evaluation practice of foreign language textbooks in China.This paper summarizes the development course and characteristics of ESL textbook evaluation checklists abroad in the past 50 years.The development of ESL textbook evaluation checklists has gone through three stages,namely the initial stage,the growing stage,and the prosperous stage.In this process,the theoretical foundation has been moving towards precision,the evaluation elements have been developing towards appropriateness,and the evaluation methods have been evolving towards dynamism.In order to improve the quality of Chinese foreign language textbook evaluation and compilation,the paper proposes that a tree-form theoretical system with a prominent backbone and clear collateral branches should be established,a textbook evaluation element system with appropriate indicators and hierarchical segmentation should be constructed,and an evaluation feedback and optimization chain with dynamic and static aspects empowered by technology should be built.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38