检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阚维[1] 施克灿[2,3] 杜瑞军[4] KAN Wei;SHI Kecan;DU Ruijun(Bejing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学教育学部课程与教学研究院,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学教育学部党委,北京100875 [3]北京师范大学历史与文化研究院,北京100875 [4]北京师范大学教育学部高等教育研究院,北京100875
出 处:《中国高教研究》2024年第9期75-82,共8页China Higher Education Research
基 金:国家高端智库中国教育与社会发展研究院委托项目“新时期高校师德师风综合评价指标研究”(Zx2022001)的研究成果。
摘 要:当前高校师德师风评价的主要困境在于评价指标缺乏整体性、过程简单化和人文性不足。其原因包括对师德师风内涵的研究不够充分、对综合评价指标的研究有待提高等。基于一系列有关高校师德建设工作的文件,确定高校师德师风综合评价指标。该综合评价指标提出高校师德师风建设过程中需要具备的“要素”性指标,即包括“结构性要素”“能动性要素”“连接性要素”和“文化性要素”,弥补以往高校师德评价指标借用政策性文件内容未能起到价值引领和科学评价的不足。The main dilemma of the current evaluation of teacher ethics in colleges and universities lies in the lack of holistic,simplicity in process and lack of humanity on evaluation indicators.The reasons for this situation are including insufficient studies on the connotation of teacher ethics and morality,and the need to improve the research on comprehensive evaluation indexes(CEI).Based on a series of documents,this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation index of teacher ethics in universities.It is the first time to proposes the"elemental indexes"that need to be available in the process of teacher ethics construction in universities,which include"structural elements","enabling elements","transversal elements",and"cultural elements",which makes up for the fact that the previous evaluation indicators of teacher ethics in universities borrowed from policy documents and failed to play the role of value leadership and scientific evaluation.At present,this CEI has been initially utilized in the self-assessment of some universities and the questionnaire research tools of external mutual evaluation.
分 类 号:G645.1[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147