"课程思政"视域下口腔颌面部解剖学实验教学模式设计与实践  

Application of the Ideological and Political Teaching Mode of One Body,Two Lines,Three Sections and Four Comments in Experimental Teaching of Oral and Maxillofacial Anatomy

作　　者：顿爱社 陈岱韻 庄东明 侯海峰 张春菊 王洪宾 张海东 DUN Ai-she;CHEN Dai-yun;ZHUANG Dong-ming;HOU Hai-feng;ZHANG Chun-ju;WANG Hong-bin;ZHANG Hai-dong(School of Stomatology,Shandong First Medical University,Jinan 250117,China;School of Public Health and Health Management,Shandong First Medical University,Jinan 250117,China;School of Clinical and Basic Medicine,Shandong First Medical University,Jinan 250117,China)

机构地区：[1]山东第一医科大学口腔医学院,济南250117 [2]山东第一医科大学公共卫生与健康管理学院,济南250117 [3]山东第一医科大学临床与基础医学院,济南250117

出　　处：《四川解剖学杂志》2024年第4期214-217,共4页Sichuan Journal of Anatomy

基　　金：2023年山东省高等学校课程思政教学改革研究项目(SZ2023071);2023山东省高等教育学会高等教育研究专项课题(SDGJ2023C20);2023年山东省本科教学改革研究项目(Z2023182);中华医学会医学教育分会、全国医学教育发展中心2023年医学教育研究课题项目(2023B207);山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)教育教学改革研究项目(XM2023027、XM2023018、XZ2022002、XM2022009、XM2022054);2019年山东省一流本科课程《局部解剖学》项目资助。

摘　　要：目的:探讨"课程思政"视域下口腔颌面部解剖学实验教学模式设计与实践.方法:抽取山东第一医科大学口腔医学院2022级口腔医学160名本科学生作为研究对象,按班级将其分为试验组(n=51,3班,采用"一体两线三段四评"课程思政教学模式)和对照组(n=109,1~2班,采用传统教学法).比较两组学生课程考核成绩及问卷调查评价教学效果.结果:试验组与对照组及格率分别为100%(51/51)、98.2%(107/109),两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);优秀学生人数分别为13人(24.5%)、11人(9.90%),两组间差异有统计学意义,教师评价、技能测评、总成绩,实验组学生比对照组得分高,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).问卷调查,试验组学生各项评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:"一体两线三段四评"课程思政教学模式优于传统教学法,该课程思政教学模式可供同行们借鉴,并在其他课程教学过程中进一步完善推广.Objective:To explore the application of the ideological and political teaching mode of one body,two lines,three sections and four comments in experimental teaching of Oral and Maxillofacial Anatomy.Method:A total of 160 undergraduate students majoring in stomatology from the School of Stomatology,Shandong First Medical University in 2022 were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into experimental group(n=51,came from 3 classes,using the"integrated two line three section four evaluation"course ideological and political teaching mode)and control group(n=109,came from 1~2 classes,using traditional teaching methods)according to their classes.Compare the course assessment scores of two groups of students and evaluate the teaching effectiveness through a questionnaire survey.Result:The pass rates of experimental 1 group and control group were 1100%(51/51)and98.2%(107/109),

关 键 词：实验教学 课程思政 教学模式 

分 类 号：G641[文化科学—高等教育学] R78-4[文化科学—教育学]