检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王莹 王亚红 赵瑞娜 韦瑶 王红燕 蔡胜 李建初 杨萌 Ying Wang;Yahong Wang;Ruina Zhao;Yao Wei;Hongyan Wang;Sheng Cai;Jianchu Li;Meng Yang(Department of Ultrasound,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Health Management,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院、北京协和医院超声医学科,100730 [2]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院、北京协和医院健康医学部,100730
出 处:《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》2024年第2期163-166,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(82001853);中央高水平医院临床科研业务费资助项目(2022-PUMCH-C-053)。
摘 要:目的比较网络教学与传统教学在超声专业血管超声理论培训中的效果。方法纳入2020年度北京协和医院超声规培基地的第一年规培医师共21名,将其随机分为传统教学组11名,网络教学组10名。传统教学组进行现场理论授课,网络教学组进行在线直播教学。培训开始前和结束后,纳入对象均进行血管超声知识测试,并进行课程满意度调查。比较2组的测试评分及课程满意度调查结果。结果培训前,传统教学组血管超声知识测试分数的平均分为(73.50±18.11)分,网络教学组的平均分为(73.18±13.09)分,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.803)。培训后,传统教学组与网络教学组的平均分比较(87.50±10.87 vs 85.00±10.25),差异无统计学意义(P=0.532)。2组培训后的血管超声知识测试分数均较培训前有显著提高,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。2组规培医师对课程内容和授课方式的满意度差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论网络教学在血管超声理论培训方面能够实现教学目标,提升规培医师血管超声的诊断能力,具有与传统教学方式相当的教学效果,并具有便捷性和在线互动的优势。Objective To compare the effectiveness of online teaching and traditional teaching in theoretical training of vascular ultrasound among ultrasound residents.Methods Twenty-one first-year residents from the ultrasound training base of Peking Union Medical College Hospital in 2020 were included and randomly divided into a traditional teaching group(11 participants)and an online teaching group(10 participants).The traditional teaching group received on-site theoretical lectures,while the online teaching group received live streaming lectures.Before and after the training,all participants underwent a vascular ultrasound knowledge test and a course satisfaction survey.The test scores and course satisfaction survey results were compared between the two groups.Results Before the training,the average score of the vascular ultrasound test for the traditional teaching group was(73.50±18.11)points,and for the online teaching group it was(73.18±13.09)points,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.803).After the training,the average scores of the traditional teaching group vs the online teaching group were(87.50±10.87)points vs(85.00±10.25)points,with no significant difference between them(P=0.532).There was a significant improvement in the vascular ultrasound knowledge test scores for both groups after the training(P<0.05 for both groups).There was no statistically significant difference in the satisfaction to course content and teaching methods between the two groups(P>0.05 for both).Conclusion Online teaching in theoretical training of vascular ultrasound can achieve teaching goals and enhance the diagnostic ability of residents in vascular ultrasound,and has comparable teaching effectiveness to traditional teaching,with the advantages of convenience and online interaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.252.203