检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏潘婷 尤微 WEI Pan-ting;YOU Wei(Yangzhou Polytechnic College,Yangzhou 225009,China)
机构地区:[1]扬州职业大学,江苏扬州225009
出 处:《扬州教育学院学报》2024年第3期86-90,共5页Journal of Yangzhou College of Education
基 金:扬州职业大学高等教育科学研究课题(2023GJ16)。
摘 要:我国高等教育实践在“知识论”维度取得显著成就,但存在忽视“生存论”维度的问题,表现为:培养目标偏重理性“知识人”,人才培养活动缺乏个体独特性,文理隔离危害健全理性发展,课程设计与评价标准的唯认知取向等。需将“生存论”拉回现代高等教育理论的讨论场,转变教育目标,关注学生精神生命与良好生存;尊重学生基于禀赋和兴趣的个人规划,重塑新的学科知识观念和建立多元价值的课程评价体系。China has made significant achievements in the practice of higher education in terms of teaching knowledge,but there is a tendency of neglecting the“existential”dimension,which is manifested in the following aspects:an overemphasis on educational goals of cultivating scholars,a deficiency in fostering individual uniqueness among students,adverse impacts of segregating liberal arts from sciences on balanced intellectual growth,and a predominantly cognitive orientation in curriculum design and assessment criteria.To rectify this,it is crucial to reintegrate the“existential”perspective into the discussion of modern higher education.This entails reorienting educational objectives to deeply focusing on students’spiritual well-being and personal fulfillment.It also involves respecting students’individual aspirations based on their talents and interests,redefining disciplinary concepts,and establishing a course evaluation system that accommodates diverse values.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171